- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Messages
- 18,779
Drones isn’t good. We made him look good.same difference. VT is a veteran team. Drones is good, the DL is good. Pry is a corch. if they kick that field goal we lose.
Drones isn’t good. We made him look good.same difference. VT is a veteran team. Drones is good, the DL is good. Pry is a corch. if they kick that field goal we lose.
He's big strong and hard to bring down. With a good coach he's very goodDrones isn’t good. We made him look good.![]()
Ehh... it's was really just 3 or 4plays that made him look decent. 2 broken scrambles and 2 plays where we couldn't tackle his big ***.Drones isn’t good. We made him look good.![]()
He is incredibly inaccurate. Have you seen him against Rutgers or Ole Dominion? He didn’t look like last night.He's big strong and hard to bring down. With a good coach he's very good
throwing "stat lines" lmao. you mean, what actually matters?Or you can just watch the games and quit throwing stat lines at me. Not going to argue about it. We aren't a NC team.
If we win the acc and look good vs a top end sec team, I'll gladly come back and eat crow.
He had 189 yards passing on 57% completion. That’s not goodDrones isn’t good. We made him look good.![]()
Run game hasn’t been good. All the yards have come late in blowout gamesthrowing "stat lines" lmao. you mean, what actually matters?
We have the #1 offense in the nation in YPP (still will be top 3 probably after this week), a potential heisman-winning QB, and a throw-first offense
our run game has been fine, just because it's not good enough for you and isn't 10 yards per carry, that doesn't mean it hasn't been efficient
Stat lines aren't going to show you the issues. Take away a 17 yard run and a botched snapped for 8 and you could claim it was below 3 ypc. Our run scheme is *** and rbs consistently missing lanes. Ol consistently getting knocked back. I have no ******* clue how a team can be so good as pass blocking and then get their **** pushed in running the ball.throwing "stat lines" lmao. you mean, what actually matters?
We have the #1 offense in the nation in YPP (still will be top 3 probably after this week), a potential heisman-winning QB, and a throw-first offense
our run game has been fine, just because it's not good enough for you and isn't 10 yards per carry, that doesn't mean it hasn't been efficient
ah the ol "take away all of our good plays and we suck" argumentStat lines aren't going to show you the issues. Take away a 17 yard run and a botched snapped for 8 and you could claim it was below 3 ypc. Our run scheme is *** and rbs consistently missing lanes. Ol consistently getting knocked back. I have no ******* clue how a team can be so good as pass blocking and then get their **** pushed in running the ball.
Our best bet is to get in pistol and run zone/power or introduce a ton of read option/rpo they run when poffs in the game.
**** go watch famu. Quit sending me a stat lines where our qb ran for 60 yards in pass blocking sets telling me our run game is fine.
Those stats are bad. He made big plays he normally doesn’t make and drove down the field at ease to nearly win it. Shouldn’t have ever happened.He had 189 yards passing on 57% completion. That’s not good
What ranked Kentucky? They would lose to VTech if VTech played anywhere close to how they did last nightNot trying to be that guy but this is cope. VT is not the team you want a wake up call from. They lost to Vanderbilt of all teams.
We could have said the same thing after the GT loss last year but we got worse after that game. The type of wake up call game you want is Georgia's wake up call against a ranked Kentucky team not a team that might not make a bowl game.
throwing "stat lines" lmao. you
Hey dip ****, I'm talking about not being a NC team due to secondary and rush game. Don't forget my point. Watch the games. I even said in a reply "we also have cam ward, lol"ah the ol "take away all of our good plays and we suck" argument
did you know if we took away cam ward's 4 touchdown passes last night, he would have zero?
wow, we should bench cam ward, that's unacceptable
Dude the run game isnt and hasn’t been good. They picked up yards vs famu and ball st in the 2nd half of blowout games. Didn’t run the ball good vs usf either then Lyle broke the 91 yard run when the game was in handah the ol "take away all of our good plays and we suck" argument
did you know if we took away cam ward's 4 touchdown passes last night, he would have zero?
wow, we should bench cam ward, that's unacceptable
but if it works? lol how about the running back pass that threw the ball into the stands.I thought Pry out coached Mario last night. Sure he had some bone head plays like the fake FG but if it works he’s a genius.
Mario is a great recruiter but on game day he’s a liability. This is why I thought Lane Kiffin was the better choice but we will see how it plays out.
according too many on here, hes a secret genius who outcoached MarioBrent Pry. That's how. I said last night, he is holding them back from reaching their full potential. Dude is a corch.
every team gets tested. we need a magic fumble return too beat BC in 2001.
That being said, our CB's are a problem. Our DT's arent the greatest either.
There are many take away a from this game and we just proved we don’t need out “A” game to win an ACC game. No team plays their “A” game every week. The take away is we found a way to win while not playing our best game.If this pitiful VT team can come to within 1 replay of beating us at home in our first ACC game of the season in front of that crowd, then just about any ACC team can beat us.
We need our A-game every week or we will fall short of expectations. That is it. That is the only take away.
Cam was also the reason we were in a dog fight last night (3 turnovers)? Help me make sense of that dichotomy.A wake up call means you were smelling yourself. If our first conference game after beating up on G5 schools and coaches isn't enough to have you ready this is the same Canes. Cam is the only reason I believe in this team so anything being different relies heavily on him.