They need a better prosecutor than this!

Status
Not open for further replies.
What I find to be very disturbing is these two cops let one man whip their ***. Maybe if they could fight they wouldn't need weapons. Only cowards are quick to pull. It's more rewarding to over power a man and whip his *** than to shoot him. They got tased because they soft and really had no business taking things as far as they did
What I find disturbing is that you can breath without having to constantly remind yourself.

as a cop, you aren’t supposed to out wrestle or out fight the bad guys, and if you don’t, they get to just get away.
 
Advertisement
Its not provable for anything. Joke charges. Its not even a reasonable person standard- its what a reasonable cop would do in that situation. Any cop in the world would return fire if someone had assaulted them during the course of an arrest, forcibly took his taser, then tried to shoot him with it.

I've been tasered before- it's no picnic.

Not to mention what would be stopping the guy from taking the officers pistol had the officer been tasered. This case isn't as cut and dry as the Minnesota one, but because those cops in Minnesota ****ed up so royally, others are now under the microscope.
 
Perry Mason.webp
 
Fear of Imminent serious bodily harm or death . . . [generally - not actual Georgia statue]
The DA literally stated 2 weeks prior that the taser is a deadly weapon.

What is the definition of a deadly weapon? A weapon that can cause death or great bodily harm.

The DA sold his soul to the mob and that Mayor is a joke. Ive NEVER voted red in my life but the Dems are lost. They are not leaders, they are appeasers.
 
Last edited:
Fear of Imminent serious bodily harm or death . . . [generally - not actual Georgia statue]
I remember that for self-defense. My question is going more towards the commission of a deadly felony and stopping the completion of it. @Ash Joshi sounds like this is up your area.
 
Marilyn Mosby overcharged in the Freddy Gray case and they all walked. She's now being sued by the officers and dealt with some other **** for withholding evidence from the defense attorneys. But, it's Baltimore so shes still the States Attorney. Until last week I legitimately thought they were going to re-elect Sheila Dixon as mayor too.
Another political know it all
 
Advertisement
I barely remember this from law school and never practiced criminal law but I think there’s a thing where if you are shooting a fleeing deadly felon/ continuing the act of committing a deadly felony like a murder, you can but if they are stopped and detained and then flee, I don’t know if that changes it???? @Gatorhater or @TimeB0mb might know.
I do not practice any more but normally state laws would control and can differ. Usually not a good look when suspect is shot twice in the back. There is a question whether suspect or victim depending on end result, was in process of committing a crime and endangering a life. Things like this are not, in my experience, as cut and dry as people would like. Fighting with police, grabbing and taking away one of their lesser means to subdue you and running away as not a good look wither. Turning and the taser discharging is not good look either.

When I practice the biggest issue actually was, who am I representing. Since I am not making money remember you get what you pay for. This is more than a legal case to the public with expectations that might already be lost. I think the officer has been charged with "Felony Murder". I heard that is punishable by death in GA. Death cases are hard. Jumping out to me if I was getting paid to defend accused is what the **** felony was he committing at the time the death took place. Not sure about GA law but if the accused/officer needed to be committing a felony then he is probably walking and more trouble will be a coming. Why they charged him this was I do not know. Maybe grandstanding by prosecutor of maybe doubt they can convict on issues of excessive force, or maybe want the "biggest" crime they can find. I have no idea if the cops committed a crime,, but if someone gives me 3-1, I bet he walks because is not charged with a crime he might have committed. As always, it depends on the attorney he gets. While all men are created equal and are equal in the eyes of the law, all attorneys are not.
 
I do not practice any more but normally state laws would control and can differ. Usually not a good look when suspect is shot twice in the back. There is a question whether suspect or victim depending on end result, was in process of committing a crime and endangering a life. Things like this are not, in my experience, as cut and dry as people would like. Fighting with police, grabbing and taking away one of their lesser means to subdue you and running away as not a good look wither. Turning and the taser discharging is not good look either.

When I practice the biggest issue actually was, who am I representing. Since I am not making money remember you get what you pay for. This is more than a legal case to the public with expectations that might already be lost. I think the officer has been charged with "Felony Murder". I heard that is punishable by death in GA. Death cases are hard. Jumping out to me if I was getting paid to defend accused is what the **** felony was he committing at the time the death took place. Not sure about GA law but if the accused/officer needed to be committing a felony then he is probably walking and more trouble will be a coming. Why they charged him this was I do not know. Maybe grandstanding by prosecutor of maybe doubt they can convict on issues of excessive force, or maybe want the "biggest" crime they can find. I have no idea if the cops committed a crime,, but if someone gives me 3-1, I bet he walks because is not charged with a crime he might have committed. As always, it depends on the attorney he gets. While all men are created equal and are equal in the eyes of the law, all attorneys are not.
Thanks. I’m not familiar with what happened in Atlanta but it sounds like political overcharging.
 
Marilyn Mosby overcharged in the Freddy Gray case and they all walked. She's now being sued by the officers and dealt with some other **** for withholding evidence from the defense attorneys. But, it's Baltimore so shes still the States Attorney. Until last week I legitimately thought they were going to re-elect Sheila Dixon as mayor too.
If they keep voting the same poorly performing officials they deserve what they get...
 
@Tetragrammaton Cane obviously doesnt know the dangers of mob rule. Perhaps 5,000 lynchings isnt a big enough sample size to let you know mob rule is a bad thing. Or maybe dude prefers the show trials you would see in the Soviet Union or in Cuba after the revolution.
Last line is spot on. Go back to his old posts on Cuba. Guy is the teen vogue editor...
 
Thanks. I’m not familiar with what happened in Atlanta but it sounds like political overcharging.
Yeah. If I am correct about felony murder then the question is did they overcharge for outside pressure or, much worse, because they want the unrest that will follow if he gets off? I learn long ago that "stupid" is merely a tool to cover up the real frigging evil crap our ruling class does.


 
Advertisement
Yeah. If I am correct about felony murder then the question is did they overcharge for outside pressure or, much worse, because they want the unrest that will follow if he gets off? I learn long ago that "stupid" is merely a tool to cover up the real frigging evil crap our ruling class does.

It’s really bad because when they get off on an overcharge, people will riot, whereas if they are charged properly and convicted, justice is met.
 
What I find to be very disturbing is these two cops let one man whip their ***. Maybe if they could fight they wouldn't need weapons. Only cowards are quick to pull. It's more rewarding to over power a man and whip his *** than to shoot him. They got tased because they soft and really had no business taking things as far as they did
****. That's true. They should've knocked that punk outand they couldn't. Even got the taser out of their hands. Cops as part of their certification should continuously train in hand to hand combat. I'ld put that soft drunk to sleep.
 
In a 2 on 1 situation you let a drunk man best you and take your taser. Already you deserve to be fired or reassigned.

Then while chasing him he, without really aiming, wildly fires the taser in your direction. The taser has no affect on you whatsoever. The guy takes a few additional steps and then you shoot him twice in the back most likely out of fear you you’ll have to fight him again.

The victim did not help matters but the cops are trash and should be held accountable. Cowards if you ask me. Any reasonable coward would have killed that man, not any reasonable person.
 
I remember that for self-defense. My question is going more towards the commission of a deadly felony and stopping the completion of it. @Ash Joshi sounds like this is up your area.

Need more details of the hypothetical . . . In the Atlanta case, there was felony threatening of a police officer when grappling with and disarming the officer. Pointing it at the officer is felony number two and also justification under the SBH rule for the use of deadly force. Doesn't matter where subject ends up getting hit . . . Tragic outcome, but justified shoot. DA is nuts . . .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top