- Joined
- Jan 2, 2017
- Messages
- 777
Wake over DukeThere is no chance I'm searching through 2,840 posts, so....
Who do we root for this weekend to get into the ACC Championship game? I think I get the at large breakdown.
VT over uva
We win we in
Wake over DukeThere is no chance I'm searching through 2,840 posts, so....
Who do we root for this weekend to get into the ACC Championship game? I think I get the at large breakdown.
As I mentioned a few days ago, we don’t necessarily need Duke to lose. But good luck figuring out the SportSource Analytics ranking.
Straight from the ACC website:
Miami clinches a spot in the championship game with:
- Win + UVA loss + DUKE loss + SMU win OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE loss + UVA loss + NCSU win OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE loss + UVA loss + UNC win + SYR win OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE loss + UVA loss + UNC win + BC win + Finish higher than GT & SMU in SportSource Analytics ranking OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE loss + UVA win + NCSU win + SYR win OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE loss + UVA win + NCSU win + BC win + Finish higher than GT & SMU in SportSource Analytics ranking OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE win + UVA loss + NCSU win OR
- Win + SMU win + DUKE win + UVA loss + NCSU win + Finish higher than DUKE in SportSource Analytics ranking
does that ranking load for anyone else?
Clear as mud
I just got a bunch of sliders without an ability to compare teams. Am on phone though. If it works probably works on a computerdoes that ranking load for anyone else?
View attachment 344098
this scenario gives me major hope
I assume we finish above duke in every possible way but idk because I can't get that ranking tool to load
Yes, Phillips is a cuck and fran brown is their ***** lol - check the clip belowThat’s what the ACC gets for being cucks. Cancel the ACC ND partnership ASAP. Let them figure out their schedule independently and see where that gets them.
You think ACC has subscription already or are saving money and will only buy if they need it for tiebreakerthis is a great example of why the acc is trash
sports source analytics was acquired by trackingfootball
you need a paid subscription to their rankings
I imagine though, we're above all teams in the acc if we win out
Tracking Football | Football Player Athleticism | Athletic Analytics
Tracking Football delivers advanced football scouting analytics using verified athletic data, including combine results and multi-sport metrics, to help teams make smarter recruiting decisions.www.trackingfootball.com
Neither needs them but both would roll out the red carpet out to have them. Big Ten’s media deal includes a built-in increase if ND joins, if I'm not mistaken.Would love to see what ND does without the ACC
SEC or Big X certainly don't need there ***
The sports source rankings = Miami >>>>>> Duke, like any ranking system in existenceAs I mentioned a few days ago, we don’t necessarily need Duke to lose. But good luck figuring out the SportSource Analytics ranking.
Straight from the ACC website:
Miami clinches a spot in the championship game with:
- Win + UVA loss + DUKE loss + SMU win OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE loss + UVA loss + NCSU win OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE loss + UVA loss + UNC win + SYR win OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE loss + UVA loss + UNC win + BC win + Finish higher than GT & SMU in SportSource Analytics ranking OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE loss + UVA win + NCSU win + SYR win OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE loss + UVA win + NCSU win + BC win + Finish higher than GT & SMU in SportSource Analytics ranking OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE win + UVA loss + NCSU win OR
- Win + SMU win + DUKE win + UVA loss + NCSU win + Finish higher than DUKE in SportSource Analytics ranking
Would be so much easier if this Mickey Mouse league just said highest ranked team gets the tiebreakerAs I mentioned a few days ago, we don’t necessarily need Duke to lose. But good luck figuring out the SportSource Analytics ranking.
Straight from the ACC website:
Miami clinches a spot in the championship game with:
- Win + UVA loss + DUKE loss + SMU win OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE loss + UVA loss + NCSU win OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE loss + UVA loss + UNC win + SYR win OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE loss + UVA loss + UNC win + BC win + Finish higher than GT & SMU in SportSource Analytics ranking OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE loss + UVA win + NCSU win + SYR win OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE loss + UVA win + NCSU win + BC win + Finish higher than GT & SMU in SportSource Analytics ranking OR
- Win + SMU loss + DUKE win + UVA loss + NCSU win OR
- Win + SMU win + DUKE win + UVA loss + NCSU win + Finish higher than DUKE in SportSource Analytics ranking
Keep in mind, the SportsSource ranking is only based on ACC play, from my understanding.The sports source rankings = Miami >>>>>> Duke, like any ranking system in existence
Wake over Duke
VT over uva
We win we in
Nah we gotta play someone in the acc-cgDoesn't the SMU game matter too?
I know noone believes me and I keep saying it on all the threads but I believe the committee is trying to avoid any in or out scenario due to title games.Wrong. Completely wrong.
There will be a re-rank after conference championships, and there WILL be movement.
Don’t even need Wake over Duke. VT over UVA and we’re in (assuming NCST and BC win)There is no chance I'm searching through 2,840 posts, so....
Who do we root for this weekend to get into the ACC Championship game? I think I get the at large breakdown.