MEGA There’s Still Hope for the ACCCG/CFB Playoffs Mega Merge Thread

... But then Oregon would have losses to ND who would be top 8, and USC who would be right around or likely ahead of us... Tell me why would the argument for Utah and ND being "they have better losses" apply to them but not also to Oregon? Lmao we all know it's absolutely bull****, but that's literally what they just said. Oregon's quality losses outweigh our beating of ND.

We want Oregon to win to lock in the 3rd and final B1G team in playoffs. It also works to weaken NDs best win to date. Instead of them being able to say we both have top 10 wins (if USC beat Oregon) the best they would say is Miami has a top 10 win and they have a top 20 win...
They literally said two weeks ago how you’re playing late matters when defending ND for not losing . On top of that Oregon has an awful resume . So the committee can point to USC beating them H2H and then allows Miami ND to get in without all the drama from media. Oregon losing this late at home with a crappy resume leaves no gripe.
 
Advertisement
Eh, I'd add we intentionally slowed down in Dallas in some critical moments. With 6 min remaining in the game, I was yelling for a kill shot and a 2 for 1 possession, and we seemed intent on grinding that **** all the way down. We also ran more PA on 3rd and short the last couple games than we've seemingly run all season - certainly, in Dallas. The bad defenses are a big factor. My concern is we won't be as "loose" against better defenses.

I felt the opposite in Dallas, although I certainly see your point. I turned to a friend when we got the ball at 6 minutes left and said "A good team ends the game on offense right here". I am aggressive by nature, but in a situation like that, when you're in full control on offense, you just squeeze the life out of the game. JMO. That's how I'd have played it, but it sure as **** didn't work, so I'm not saying that's the only or even the right way.

I do agree on the PA stuff last week. I said it several times, and if you missed my posts, I said many times how predictable we'd been on short yardage for essentially half the season. We didn't throw the ball on a single short yardage situation for literally 5 games. I can't even believe I'm writing that, but it's true. We did last week, so I was probably too harsh in the post you replied to. I don't think the offense is different, but I do think we at least broke some tendencies against NC State, so at a minimum, that should help.

2nd drive, 2nd and 2 from the 38, we took a deep shot to Toney. We had literally run the ball almost 30 straight times on a 2 or less to go situation.
Next play, we throw it again on 3rd and 2, again, something we didn't do ONCE for 5 games. First down to Marion.
Next drive, 3rd and 2, we throw to Moore. Incomplete. Mario probably wanted to shoot Dawson in the face because it didn't work, but ****, at least you're trying to do something different.

Other than that, we didn't really have any short yardage plays. I guess that's what happens when you have 20+ plays of 10 or more yards.

As you said, I'm very interested to see how they play these in tighter games against a good defense. Prior history tells us we're just going to turn and hand the ball to a back, and be thrilled if we gain 2 yards on 3rd and 1, or 3 yards on 2nd and 2.
 
This actually makes a ton of sense when you leave out the stat about Miami beating Note Dame.
It’s also manipulated nonsense in the sense that there are teams over .500 that are G5 teams power rated way below UF and “top 25 win” can be a win over a team that is about the same as #30.
 
They literally said two weeks ago how you’re playing late matters when defending ND for not losing . On top of that Oregon has an awful resume . So the committee can point to USC beating them H2H and then allows Miami ND to get in without all the drama from media. Oregon losing this late at home with a crappy resume leaves no gripe.

IMO if USC beats Oregon and UCLA, they'd jump us.

Would be 10-2, both losses on the road to ranked teams, one by 2 points.

Wins over a ranked Michigan and on the road in Eugene. They'd throw them right in the fast lane and have them cropdust us on the way by.

The committee doesn't want to put 2 ACC teams in. That much is pretty obvious. IMO the only way the Big 10 doesn't get 3 in is if Oregon and USC both go 1-1 in their last 2.
 
IMO if USC beats Oregon and UCLA, they'd jump us.

Would be 10-2, both losses on the road to ranked teams, one by 2 points.

Wins over a ranked Michigan and on the road in Eugene. They'd throw them right in the fast lane and have them cropdust us on the way by.

The committee doesn't want to put 2 ACC teams in. That much is pretty obvious. IMO the only way the Big 10 doesn't get 3 in is if Oregon and USC both go 1-1 in their last 2.
Especially after they factor in "quality of loss", whatever tf that is.
 
I don’t . I think we’re the baby face now and have momentum on the field and off with media. Just win and hope for one loss in front of us

I hope you're right. I'd feel better if OU and Utah both lost, but yeah we for sure need at least 1 team above us to lose. If you don't think a 10-2 USC would be ahead of us, then maybe you can add Oregon to that "people to kill" list. Oregon, OU, Bama, Utah, BYU. Feel free to **** the bed.
 
I don’t . I think we’re the baby face now and have momentum on the field and off with media. Just win and hope for one loss in front of us
Same. I’m putting a lot of faith in:

1. Mario winning a tough November game
2. Im right thinking the truth hidden under the talking points is they want us and Notre Dame in somehow

I’ve probably learned nothing over the last 20 years
 
They literally said two weeks ago how you’re playing late matters when defending ND for not losing . On top of that Oregon has an awful resume . So the committee can point to USC beating them H2H and then allows Miami ND to get in without all the drama from media. Oregon losing this late at home with a crappy resume leaves no gripe.
Yeah yeah that's all good and logical except they'd be a 2 loss B1G team who has a great Game Control rating, with great O/D efficiency metrics, who has a better SoS and Strength of Resume than we do lol. And again their losses would be to the #2 team and what would end up being a top 10 USC team. Explain to me how that is any different than ND? Lol.

If you seriously think Oregon is dropping below us with a loss even though they currently have kept Utah ahead of us for the bs same reasoning, you're trippin imo. Whether it SHOULD happen is irrelevant
 
Advertisement
Yeah yeah that's all good and logical except they'd be a 2 loss B1G team who has a great Game Control rating, with great O/D efficiency metrics, who has a better SoS and Strength of Resume than we do lol. And again their losses would be to the #2 team and what would end up being a top 10 USC team. Explain to me how that is any different than ND? Lol.

If you seriously think Oregon is dropping below us with a loss even though they currently have kept Utah ahead of us for the bs same reasoning, you're trippin imo. Whether it SHOULD happen is irrelevant
I can totally see a scenario where USC beats Oregon and we get bumped out along with Utah and BYU. Go Ducks!
 
I hope you're right. I'd feel better if OU and Utah both lost, but yeah we for sure need at least 1 team above us to lose. If you don't think a 10-2 USC would be ahead of us, then maybe you can add Oregon to that "people to kill" list. Oregon, OU, Bama, Utah, BYU. Feel free to **** the bed.
OU still got Missouri and lsu. I think they lose one of those
 
Game control is a larger factor than Sos.

This is why Mario needs to get it through his thick ******* skull that blowing teams out is as important as "JUST" winning the game.

We had an opportunity to blow out ND, FSU but he was too ***** to take it....
Normally, I would agree with you.

However, ESPN still builds the bias into this particular GC metric by using their preseason ranking system to evaluate GC from the beginning of the season, and it continues to impact even after the CFP rankings are released. If ESPN determines GC by putting Miami up against how ESPN believes the average Top 25 team should perform, and the Top 25 ranking is full of unfair bias, then the GC metric is also inherently flawed.

I probably posted this in the wrong place yesterday, but this post pretty much summed up why I think ESPN needs to GTFO out of all of this. The conflict of interest is insane and I can’t believe there’s not an antitrust suit yet.

 
Utah’s ad isn’t the committee’s chairman but his addition to the committee is one of the most brazenly corrupt acts I’ve ever seen
Oh, my mistake, I thought he replaced the Baylor AD. Too much going on this week!

Thanks for the correction. 🙂
 

Its frustrating that Miami > ND isnt ended immediately that Miami beat Notre Dame. That trumps all over nonsense...not even if the resumes aren't aligned...Miami beat this team already.

The differences in resume nationally are not even a proper standard deviation of difference. The QW component isnt a good barometer...no conference v conference and that's not enough to offset that Miami beat this team and handled them soundly. If you take ND and not Miami...its nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
This is why there should be 100% automatic bids or a max on conference bids. Too much shady dealings and corruption otherwise.

3 SEC, 3 B1G, 2 ACC, 2 Big 12, 2 highest ranked Go5 champs. Force ND into a conference.
Exactly
Make NO Mistake
If the committee, SEC, B10 and espn had their way
This would be their playoff every year
ND
Usc
Michigan
Ohio State
Penn state
Alabama
Georgia
Tennessee
Florida
Oklahoma
Texas

And one more B10 team (Oregon) or one team total from acc b12

They would take that EVERY year and never bat an eye as they think the cologne football world revolves around the great 8, 2 conferences, ND

Miami or some random 12th team can rotate every year but those are The schools they want PERIOD

****, they are still pining for f ing Texas right now!!!!! They don’t even hide it
 
I’ve been in the either make it 4 teams or 64 basically

No matter how far we push it back it’ll be the same debates because college has been basically a group of 3,4,5 elite teams and then a big bag of teams that are the exact same

This year is even worse though. I watch OSU a lot. They’re far from a juggernaut but compared to everyone else they look that way. Indiana could easily have two losses right now

I am not sure if 2025 Miami would beat 2024 Miami but the parity we are seeing makes the 2025 team a more compelling argument for me

I just end up throwing my hands up by the end but I can understand almost everyone’s POV here
At least when you get to 16+
You are dealing with 3 loss teams and if you lose 3 you have zero argument in my book

24 is even better
I want it EARNED not given and when you have less teams invited in this era of total parity
It reverts back to blue blood and pedigree taking the vast majority of spots, credentials be damned!!!!
 
They literally said two weeks ago how you’re playing late matters when defending ND for not losing . On top of that Oregon has an awful resume . So the committee can point to USC beating them H2H and then allows Miami ND to get in without all the drama from media. Oregon losing this late at home with a crappy resume leaves no gripe.
But then usc jumps ahead!
Which they will 100%
 
Back
Top