CanesDynasty
Recruit
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2017
- Messages
- 864
Oklahoma losing 1 of their final 2 gamesAs said before we have to get to 10, I can see us getting to 11 by jumping Utah and BYU….. but how do we get to 10?! Not jumping bama or ND
Oklahoma losing 1 of their final 2 gamesAs said before we have to get to 10, I can see us getting to 11 by jumping Utah and BYU….. but how do we get to 10?! Not jumping bama or ND
It was as of whatever time I posted it. +260 now as of 11:05ESTIs that +220 on FanDuel after tonight’s rankings release?
Miami better win by 30-40 points.Miami is gonna beat the point spread this week and next week.
******* Hard Rock Bet and their commie hold over online gambling inside Florida.It was as of whatever time I posted it. +260 now as of 11:05EST
I live in Georgia so nothing legal here, but you can turn off location settings and still see odds, just can’t bet them lol******* Hard Rock Bet and their commie hold over online gambling inside Florida.
As said before we have to get to 10, I can see us getting to 11 by jumping Utah and BYU….. but how do we get to 10?! Not jumping bama or ND
I think we jump Utah unless they absolutely hammer KSU and Kansas. BYU has a sneaky game vs Cincy. It’ll be interesting to see how the committee would evaluate Bama losing in the SECCG. There’s a pretty plausible scenario UGA plays Bama. If Bama loses that game, how does the committee view them? It killed us losing late in the year.Need 3 of these 4 to lose:
OU
Bama
BYU
Utah
Tough sledding. But doable.
We might be able to hop Utah by winning out, but that’s it. We need help.
but if they move ND to 8 we're still screwedOklahoma losing 1 of their final 2 games
Idk man. The chair sounded like they’d jump us over ND if push came to shove. I wonder what happens if it’s us, ND, Bama for that last spot. Our losses may be worse, but we beat ND and FSU. I don’t care if those losses for ND and Bama happened week 1. It has to mean something.As said before we have to get to 10, I can see us getting to 11 by jumping Utah and BYU….. but how do we get to 10?! Not jumping bama or ND
But if we can jump BYU and Utah we’d be at 11. If OU does lose we’d get to 10. If we get idgaf about ND. We aren’t hosting a game unless we sneak into the ACCCG and absolutely hammer whoever we play.but if they move ND to 8 we're still screwed
they apparently only compare teams 9-12
we need to swap with ND or get to 10
if ND is 8 and we're 12 we won't be compared and we we're out. if ND is 9 and we're 12, then what? idk
He should have been doing this two weeks ago.Tbf this was in the equivalent of two weeks from now. I’d assume he is strategizing the PR gameplan for pushing back on this![]()
sooner rather than later rn
Then there's...Greg Mcilroy or whatever on espn just said that you’re looking for a point of comparison for Miami and Notre Dame and that common opponent is Pitt…..
If only there was a MORE DEFINITIVE point of comparison between Miami and ND…………..
Moving up one spot puts us in the same tier as ND and the H2H becomes a factor. We are ranked where we are right now to avoid having to factor it in. But if it comes down to us or them, I think they know they would face too much backlash for not honoring the H2H.As said before we have to get to 10, I can see us getting to 11 by jumping Utah and BYU….. but how do we get to 10?! Not jumping bama or ND
Not to mention two weeks removed from beating GT. So they had an entire week to prepare and they under 100 yards until that garbage TD with our reserves in the game. ND was ahead 12-10 until :32 in the third against BC. Just seems like their losses are freaking propping them up to an absolutely insane degree.Then there's...
Miami vs NC St. (halfway through the 3rd):
31-0
ND vs NC St, (halfway through the 3rd):
10-7
The Eliminated part under C was my confusion, I ran a few different ACC predictors, and they all had Miami as the tie breaker, so I figured, it went to tie breaker E, The ACC site doesn't seem to have clear language on it.****, I had this on a spreadsheet at home (go ahead and make fun of me!) and I'm at work right now.
In a 3-way tie, you would have to go beyond the first criterion (point a), which is "head-to-head" when everyone plays everyone. Miami not playing UVa forces us to the next requirement.
Without redoing all the work (for now), it would then move to records against COMMON OPPONENTS. This is where I pointed out that UVa is damaged by LOSING TO NC STATE, which was NOT a conference game, but WOULD count when evaluating common opponents.
View attachment 343201
Within b, with the 3 teams you mentioned (UVa, UM, and SMU), UVa did not play UM or SMU. UM only lost to SMU. SMU only beat UM. So, again, within b, you do not have EITHER a tied team which beat the other two tied teams OR a tied team which LOST to the other tied teams, thus the criterion b would not be met in a way that eliminates any team.
Moving to criterion c, in my original example, I did not have SMU in the mix. SMU did NOT play NC State, so you can't use NC State for this one. I believe that the TWO common opponents for UVa, SMU, and UM would be Stanford and Louisville. UVa and SMU each won both of those games, while Miami lost to Louisville. So on criterion c, Miami would be ELIMINATED.
Then, there would be a 2-team tie between UVa and SMU which would be broken by the "2 team tie" rules.
Not good to boast after back to back losses. Best thing we have going for us is there is a genuine wider outrage, from non-Miami fans, heating upHe should have been doing this two weeks ago.
Only prize picks here in ga smh. Thats a scam too lolI live in Georgia so nothing legal here, but you can turn off location settings and still see odds, just can’t bet them lol