I still say that's why Richt left, he saw it without rose colored glasses on. You think these players that lost to not one, but the three garbage teams he talked about could win a National Title with just a new coach? That coach better arrive with a powerful genie in a bottle if you think that.
People put way too much in high school rating services, they're for profit businesses and they help in evaluating talent. You still have to find and recruit the players that fit your program, are coachable and have the mental make-up and drive to win. Guys who make those around them better and don't put up with others who hurt or quit on the team.
Ask yourself, would you want to be in a fox hole with a majority of the guys given their effort in the three games he mentioned, or even in a huge bar fight where you had to depend on them? The guys you would consider are the Mofos needed to turn around what has become a perennial underperformer - and they get harder to find every recruiting cycle.
National title?
****, I just want a Coastal title and proceed from there.
The difference between a championship and .500 season IS NOT nearly as big as people think.
I don’t know who the players really are because the coaching leadership has been so flawed for so long.
The difference in team atmosphere between a self assured leader of men and a shook, perpetrating, try hard is like the difference between a full grown Sabre tooth tiger and a premature new born Siamese kitten.
It makes a WORLD of difference and people are always trying to undermine that fact with misguided talent arguments and blaming teenagers/ 20 year olds for being unfocused and having maturity issues.
Some players are hungry and self motivated no matter what. Some are lazy and half *** no matter what. The majority perform to the level that they are lead to.
Our talent isn’t that much better than mediocre teams. Nobodies talent is outside of the top five or so most elite teams.What we have are dangerous players with specific skills that can win most of their games IF they are used AND developed PROPERLY.
By and large, young men don’t show up disciplined and focused to perform a task. They NEED discipline and leadership from people with experience, competence, and confidence.
Most of the guys who performed valiant acts in real foxholes during combat did not show up to basic training as serious, focused, mature, disciplined enlistees. Many of them were ***** ups and ****birds. The Army has a SYSTEM that turns goofy recruits into disciplined warriors. If you are at least average (and sometimes below) they will turn you into a good soldier more likely than not.
I can’t accurately judge the players because the SYSTEM has they are subject to is a complete disaster. Thus, I cannot tell you if they are the type I would go to war with.
I can tell you that by changing leadership, guys who I would not go to war with became guys that I would go to war with and vice versa. That is how important leadership really is.