The Past Decade: Revealed

[Brian Piccolo]

LMAO. MMMMkay.

When you're shooting in the dark this is about as much as you can say.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

Ironic statement of the year. Come get your award.

I don't mind trading with them every now and then.

But they're mostly retards.

Go read their stuff.

 

[imurcane]

JJ owning this thread.

One suggestion, the ignore feature is your friend.

 

[imurcane]

We should have made the finals this year since being a national seed is so predictable.

It's predictable getting to Omaha.

So as usual you're lost.

And then it's not predictable. Unless Miami wins as a national seed. Then it's predictable.

MOAR CONTRADICTIONS!!

Less than 40% predictable these days. LOL

 

[cane since birth]

No, but my point is: "that is all that Morris controls". You use the 66-game regular season to optimally position yourself for Omaha and use the same strategy at Omaha that got you there. You need at least a weekend series to determine the better team, and in Omaha it is: "winner take all in one game".

A 1-seed gives you 40% probability to reach Omaha and each lower seed reduces the chances that you make it there. Once you are there, all coaches have the same probability of winning.

If Morris loses in the Supers with this team, and at home, you can blast him. You cannot blast him for losing essentially a coin toss.

Its not a coin toss though its about outplaying the other team, its sports not russian roulette

 

[cane since birth]

Morris performs 2x better than the probabilities dictate that he should. Omaha is a minute (small) sample equal 3% of the regular season and you have 1 game versus a series to prove your worth. Omaha is arguably the most random championship sporting event in the country. He has won Omaha twice.

Over a statistically significant sample, he has produced the 2nd best team in the country two years in a row.

You are wrong. Morris proved you wrong in both 2015 and 2016.

You do not possess the requisite mathematical skill to understand simple probability. Period.

there you go using that word "random" again, and i don't know about the whole statistically best team out there, we had a good offense last year and this year we were one of the best fielding, but heres were you contradict your post a little if he had such great statistics as you say why didn't we do anything in omaha those two years? again are you cool with just having a good regular season and regionals?

He doesn't even want to be the Buffalo Bills with JK, he is the Hawks. No real shot of winning a title, but not doing anything to get better.

Everyone talking like we rarely even get to a regional lol

 

[OriginalCanesCanesCanes]

Do Jagr and imur hold hands when they post together?

 

[cane since birth]

Do Jagr and imur hold hands when they post together?

Do you and brian cuddle with each other on those cold nights?

 

[OriginalCanesCanesCanes]

No.

I don't hang on his every post like imur does with Jagoff. Making sure to give him a a pat on the rear and encouraging words for his every post, while protecting him from all the meanies.

 

[cane since birth]

No.

I don't hang on his every post like imur does with Jagoff. Making sure to give him a a pat on the rear and encouraging words for his every post, while protecting him from all the meanies.

Looks like you are doing the same

 

[Brian Piccolo]

Its not a coin toss though its about outplaying the other team, its sports not russian roulette

And how does an inferior team outperform a superior one?

Because it's one game.

Any single baseball game is unpredictable.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Then why aren't we ever the team that wins the random single events? When was the last time we beat a superior Florida team in the postseason?

 

[Brian Piccolo]

Then why aren't we ever the team that wins the random single events?

We do.

We've won a game in 5 of the last 6 Omaha trips and have only gone 0-2 in the CWS twice ever.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

When was the last time we beat a superior Florida team in the postseason?

Could you have come up with a smaller sample size?

Your analysis is ridiculous.

Who makes their living as a coach winning road tournament games against higher seeds?

Who makes their living as a coach winning tournament games against superior teams from Florida?

These are ludicrous standards.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

My sample size is HUGE considering that you are parroting the "one game" nonsense all of a sudden. "An inferior team can win because anything can happen in one game." Okay, here's a list of a whole bunch of games when we were equal or inferior. Why didn't we win any of them?

Small sample size. Good lord.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

When was the last time we beat a superior Florida team in the postseason?

Could you have come up with a smaller sample size?

Your analysis is ridiculous.

Who makes their living as a coach winning road tournament games against higher seeds?

Who makes their living as a coach winning tournament games against superior teams from Florida?

These are ludicrous standards.

Who makes their living winning tournament games against teams from Florida? Any coach who plays Miami in Omaha.

Thanks for that freebie.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

Small sample size. Good lord.

How many times have we played a 'superior' Florida team in the postseason?

Maybe 11 times in 23 years? All of them away from home obviously.

It's a silly statistic and what makes it worse is how small the sample is.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Small sample size. Good lord.

How many times have we played a 'superior' Florida team in the postseason?

Maybe 11 times in 23 years? All of them away from home obviously.

It's a silly statistic and what makes it worse is how small the sample is.

We don't have a win against a higher seed or an equally seeded team in the last eight years.

We apparently need an entire century of Jim Morris failures in order to meet this guy's sample size requirement.

 

[BWCD]

Small sample size. Good lord.

How many times have we played a 'superior' Florida team in the postseason?

Maybe 11 times in 23 years? All of them away from home obviously.

It's a silly statistic and what makes it worse is how small the sample is.

We don't have a win against a higher seed or an equally seeded team in the last eight years.

We apparently need an entire century of Jim Morris failures in order to meet this guy's sample size requirement.

Any sample size 30 or more allows the t-distribution to approach the z-distribution (aka - normal distribution bell curve). Remember...this guy is a stickler for statistical measures...we've got to meet that 30-mark so he can confidently make assertions on the population from the sample.

Because he's ******* blind and can't use his own two eyes to watch the product on the field and see that something is off once we hit Omaha.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

15 years with not even a top 4 finish, much less a national title. The reason?

Random. Small sample size. Nothing we could do.