I think it doesn't represent the point of my post.
The home side has significantly more people than the away side. Every game.
OkThat's bullcrap. The "UM side" middle is empty and the upper deck is not "full". I look at it every game.
You're missing the point of the post. One side is not "better" than the other when it comes to attendance.
Lots of tickets are sold in the entire stadium, but lots of people stay in the parking lot, club areas, or home. No matter where they are supposed to sit.
No, I'm not willing to take your prediction. It was wrong anyway. I never disagreed with you on the turnovers. I said, "We need to limit turnovers."Are you willing to take my 24-14 pregame prediction now? Our QB is a turnover waiting to happen, our Oline weares teams down and we have more RB’s than any program in the country. Style points don’t count, but W’s do.
Whatever you think of Mario, he is absolutely playing to his personnel. That is is precisely what a coach must do.
I don’t believe this offense with the QB’s we have can score more than 20-24 points per game. So my position is how does a team win when it can’t score more, because that is who we are. These last 2 games are not aberrations, they are our present and future for the duration of this season in terms of offensive production. We have a QB who will absolutely throw no less than 2 INT’s per game against zone coverage, and a true freshman.No, I'm not willing to take your prediction. It was wrong anyway. I never disagreed with you on the turnovers. I said, "We need to limit turnovers."
My point was always that only scoring 20-24 points in regulation will lose you the game more often than not. We have been lucky that the past two teams we have faced have less offense than we have and that our defense has been putting the game on their back.
I will reiterate. 24 or fewer points will not win against anyone left on our schedule, minus maybe BC. But, even against BC, it may need to be better.
The attendance looks worse on TV because the cameras are always pointed towards the visitors side of the stadium. For whatever reason, (likely the shade) the home side is always a lot more full for games like this. Honestly, I wouldn't buy seats on the visitor's side unless they were significantly discounted vs the home side. It's why there was like 35-40k in the stadium but it looks like 20k on TV.People always say that the other side is the visitor side, but that doesn't hold water unless we're different from every away game I've ever attended. In those, we're given the absolute worst seats, generally tucked in a corner somewhere. They just aren't as desirable as sitting behind our bench and not enough of our fans are buying them.
I am amazed at how many different topics porsters can imagine to criticize anything and everything.
I am fahklempt that an anonymous poster thought enough of me to tailor a meme in my honor. Thank you!
I got a MAUDE warning for racism/bigotry for using the term Cuban Time?
Yeah…. I need an explanation on this one. As a Cuban myself, I am confused.
we will never have a public school attendance in terms of football attendance. people dont seem to get it though. this inst the market for that and it wasn't even that in the glory days. good games will be filled when the team is good, bad teams wont draw no matter how good UM is, and FSU and UF will always be full with a lot of UF and FSU fans due to the large number of alumni in SFLDon't ever underestimate UM fans to overlook decades worth of data.
This IS what a UM crowd looks like, most of the time.
We typically rank somewhere in the low to mid 30s in attendance by nearly every organization tracking these statistics (ticketed, actual, all the same).
On average, we use 60 to 65% of the stadium's overall capacity.
Nearly every school which ranks ahead of us pumps out alumni at a ratio of at least 5 to 1.
I can't believe I even respond to this **** anymore. Get the **** over it.
https://collegefootballnews.com/ran...ance-rankings-2023-five-year-program-analysis