- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 54,774
I think that winning is very overrated in recruiting but end of the day it does matter when you’re splitting hairsSo what the consensus on the factors that keep us out of that top group each year? There are always a handful of teams we’ll never catch because they have too many 5*, crazy high average ratings, etc.
Our head coach was hired because he can recruit and build the lines, if nothing else. I’m not down on him, I’m just asking what will get us over the hump.
Is it simply lack of recent success? Or do we not have the $ to get into that top group? Is our staff very good but not great at recruiting? Do we not have the following to incentivize the recruiting services to bump our guys? I’m guessing some combo but curious what those in the know thing.
Again, we’ve done well. I’m not arguing we haven’t. We’re certainly in it for more whales than before, and we’ve landed some monsters. But we’re not regularly loading up on the elite guys like the top schools that always seem to be in that top 5 area.
Can we get there? Is it a matter of time, or is that probably not in the cards for us for some reason(s).
Looking back at the top 10 teams in recruiting since Mario got here there’s one team that really doesn’t belong and that’s us
I don’t want to say it’s that simple because it’s not, but kids are front runners and they’re growing up thinking of us as a joke of a program that was good before they were born
Sometimes tough to out-recruit that when you are still struggling to win meaningful games
So on one hand I agree we’ve done far better in recruiting than we probably should have, but still a long ways to go