Miami Hurricanes Recruiting Intel: Five-Star DE Visits, Key Targets & Official Visit Preview | May 29-31, 2025

The Bank: D$ Intel Series

DMoney
DMoney
4 min read

Comments (139)

👀

D$ in the video bank

"I would bet that we land ONE of those two....[this week] was the first time i heard it even floated that we could land both. That's not impossible. I thought it was impossible because of the finances but I'm told there's a chance, but most likely we're looking at one or the other"


 
I'm hoping for 2 more Edges… 1 of the big two…Then one of Rojas/Garrer/Wittenberg.

Also would you say we lead for Hyppolite @DMoney ? Or is this a dogfight with UF. No news is seldom good news with kids that are thought to be leans.

Box safety on Valarde? He looks more versatile than that…Actually you've mentioned him as a corner before @DMoney?

I don't think he's a box safety at all. He's a little smaller and has really good speed/athleticism.
The Valarde news is a bummer. He looks awesome.
 
Last year was the depth class. Just a giant roster of recruits with a lot of developmental types in the lower half of the class.

This is the all killer, no filler class with no wasted money and every bit of cap room goes to those 4-star and above types.

Good class comin, but we really need to flip a few of these players we fought hard for but just missed out on.

With 105 spots, it’s good to have a group of developmental players in each class. I don’t see that as wasted NIL allocation because they are significantly less expensive.
And they will stick around longer, not the types that expect to see the field year 1 or they will bounce.

And that’s where good evaluations are vital. You make the talent floor of your team a bunch of hard working, high potential, lower cost players who will be loyal and grind for 4 years so you don’t have to rely so heavily on the portal.
 
I’m not pinning it on anyone. Just pointing out you can’t always believe the hype.
Hype is what they do - it's their job to hype players. If they didn't do that, not many people would listen to them.
 
Assuming only one of Henderson. Glover, or Mayfield, what are people's preferences?
 
"DE, DT, LB, S, WR"

I mean, looking at it very simplistic, he pretty much laid out the dudes in the Bank...
IMO: Bryant / Jenkins / Hypolite / Woodard / One of the LB's (don't think Henderson)

With not getting a big ticket tackle this cycle, we gotta hope he HIT on the UGA transfer or that huge Juco kid... IMO we pulled a great IOL group this cycle.. we'll probably go OT whale hunting next cycle...
 
Assuming only one of Henderson. Glover, or Mayfield, what are people's preferences?
For me price has to factor into the preference, and I don’t think paying $1 million for an edge LB makes sense.

As to that price tag, I saw a breakdown yesterday of our NIL allocation by starters at each position. Henderson should be expecting 1 million based on what people are currently being paid (assuming that what I saw was accurate).
Cantwell-2 million
Toney-1.5
McCoy-1 million
Lightfoot just over 1 million

None of our starters were under $500,000
 
I know it's part of the landscape and Mario is one of the best, but I still can't get over the fact that we are openly talking about a salary cap in college athletics.
 
"DE, DT, LB, S, WR"

I mean, looking at it very simplistic, he pretty much laid out the dudes in the Bank...
IMO: Bryant / Jenkins / Hypolite / Woodard / One of the LB's (don't think Henderson)

With not getting a big ticket tackle this cycle, we gotta hope he HIT on the UGA transfer or that huge Juco kid... IMO we pulled a great IOL group this cycle.. we'll probably go OT whale hunting next cycle...
If we finish with that, I'd be very happy.
 
I’m not pinning it on anyone. Just pointing out you can’t always believe the hype.
Sometimes, highly talented players don’t have all the traits that bring success on game days over the course of a season. Some players never develop those traits and some finally get it after some trials. Not all young players have the total package like Toney shows on a constant basis. Jojo has the ability but he has to show he can develop the other aspects. Trader isn’t the only highly talented WR not play on game days up to his talent level.
 
Agree. We're about to have to watch a full season of Toure and Chase Smith playing like 80% of snaps, and it’s gunna be annoying as ****.

Thankfully with our schedule and the potential of the offense we should not need Toure and Smith to play that much with the exception of a couple games (Clemson and ND).

Hopefully coaches use the run up to Clemson to get Pruitt, Wiley, Bonner, and Marcelin significant reps. I had high hopes for the kid we signed from Louisville but he isn’t showing up for another couple of weeks.
 
👀

D$ in the video bank

"I would bet that we land ONE of those two....[this week] was the first time i heard it even floated that we could land both. That's not impossible. I thought it was impossible because of the finances but I'm told there's a chance, but most likely we're looking at one or the other"


Sounds like it could hinge on what happens with Hayden Lowe?
 
For me price has to factor into the preference, and I don’t think paying $1 million for an edge LB makes sense.

As to that price tag, I saw a breakdown yesterday of our NIL allocation by starters at each position. Henderson should be expecting 1 million based on what people are currently being paid (assuming that what I saw was accurate).
Cantwell-2 million
Toney-1.5
McCoy-1 million
Lightfoot just over 1 million

None of our starters were under $500,000
Surpised to see McCoy that high, maybe you mean Moten?
 
For me price has to factor into the preference, and I don’t think paying $1 million for an edge LB makes sense.

As to that price tag, I saw a breakdown yesterday of our NIL allocation by starters at each position. Henderson should be expecting 1 million based on what people are currently being paid (assuming that what I saw was accurate).
Cantwell-2 million
Toney-1.5
McCoy-1 million
Lightfoot just over 1 million

None of our starters were under $500,000
That breakdown is entirely fake btw. Some guy with a nice website and good graphics but entirely made up numbers. “Projections.” Some of the numbers are probably relatively accurate but there’s also a lot of obvious poor guesses. I’m surprised no school has taken action yet bc it’s private information they’re claiming to have (don’t) and using everyone’s names and logos. Not defamation but acting as if they know something and publishing critical misinformation
 
Back
Top