caneaddict
Senior
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2012
- Messages
- 5,418
wow, kid knows butch davis well
Somebody showed me this about what a temple student wrote about golden when miami hired him. He called it "doses of reality" and it was on owlscoop.com.
1.He is a good recruiter, but a mediocre gameday coach.
Maybe a fair assessment.
2.His clock management skills are poor, as is his ability to make adjustments. He has been repeatedly outcoached in the 2nd half of games by coaches who have lesser talent but more savy. Frank Solich, Ohio U HC really has his number.
We have a lot of come back wins with Golden and his time management is fine. So completely wrong here.
3.His offense is often 1 dimensional, and he seems to stick with a gameplan well after it has been proven not to be working.He has plan A but no B.
I don't agree with this.
4.He is secretive regarding players, schemes, Offense & Defense philosphy.
He might keep some stuff in house but not sure what everyone expects?
5.He has not been able to develop a QB and establis a cohesive offensive scheme. He functioned as the special teams coach with very poor results.
I doubt he got any real QB commits at Temple either. Olsen and Kaaya can be the determining factor in this.
6.His teams have only beaten 3 D-1 teams with winning records in the past 5 years. He has not won the MAC east crown let alone mac conf title.
Your school is temple...
He said some more **** but these sound and look familiar.
6.His teams have only beaten 3 D-1 teams with winning records in the past 5 years. He has not won the MAC east crown let alone mac conf title.
6.His teams have only beaten 3 D-1 teams with winning records in the past 5 years. He has not won the MAC east crown let alone mac conf title.
That's the one that scares the **** out of me because it's definitely carried over.
6.His teams have only beaten 3 D-1 teams with winning records in the past 5 years. He has not won the MAC east crown let alone mac conf title.
That's the one that scares the **** out of me because it's definitely carried over.
Temple couldn't beat a D-1 team PERIOD when he got there then this guy is complaining about beating good D-1 teams. All that illustrates is that you can always up the ante.
As mediocre as the Big East was, it was light years better than the MAC.
And they were regularly losing to MAC teams before Golden got there.As mediocre as the Big East was, it was light years better than the MAC.
Golden beat the Big East champs (UConn) while at Temple...
As mediocre as the Big East was, it was light years better than the MAC.
Golden beat the Big East champs (UConn) while at Temple...
6.His teams have only beaten 3 D-1 teams with winning records in the past 5 years. He has not won the MAC east crown let alone mac conf title.
That's the one that scares the **** out of me because it's definitely carried over.
Temple couldn't beat a D-1 team PERIOD when he got there then this guy is complaining about beating good D-1 teams. All that illustrates is that you can always up the ante.
He definitely improved Temple. But let's not forget that he benefitted greatly by Temple moving to the MAC. As mediocre as the Big East was, it was light years better than the MAC.
Corch Al's problem with some Temple fans was that he got the program to a level of competitiveness in the MAC, but he couldn't get over the hump. And it wasn't a talent issue, because near the end of his time there, he had better players than the other MAC teams as a result of his excellent ability to recruit. T
here's definitely a pattern with him. He's a great recruiter and a good builder. But he makes every game a death struggle even against bad teams and flops against equally talented or more talented teams.
If a coach is not succeeding or leaves, people always bash him and the complaints usually sound similar. Shows you the consistency of fan rhetoric. It's not unlike fans disliking the "scheme" of any DC who is having problems. Temple was a wasteland before Golden. Hard to believe that Golden had much of any weaknesses compared to what they had seen--nor that they had even seen the "strength" they sought prior to him.
If a coach is not succeeding or leaves, people always bash him and the complaints usually sound similar. Shows you the consistency of fan rhetoric. It's not unlike fans disliking the "scheme" of any DC who is having problems. Temple was a wasteland before Golden. Hard to believe that Golden had much of any weaknesses compared to what they had seen--nor that they had even seen the "strength" they sought prior to him.
Temple was awful - no doubt. But Temple went from being in the Big East (a top 6 conference) to being in the unquestionable worst conference in CFB (MAAC).
That's the biggest reason for their success.