TCU rolling over Ole **** right now.

Those Mississippi schools weren't overrated at allllllll.

Bama is the only real team in that mighty conference and they're no better than a handful of other teams.

Which team besides FSU and perhaps TCU can matchup with them?

I'm comfortable thinking Oregon or FSU beats them. I think OSU does too with a more stable QB situation. I already bet OSU +9 in their current state. And, as you mentioned, TCU matches up. I'd almost even be inclined to throw Baylor on a neutral field in the mix. There's 5 teams right there that I think could or would win on a neutral field. For all the "it's not about last season" talk FSU gets it sure seems to be all about the last decade or whatever when evaluating Bama this year.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
But guys, Golden says times have changed and no one plays like this anymore. This defense is eerily similar to the Canes of the earlier 2000's. Patterson is one helluva coach. He has that team playing like dogs after they got snubbed for the playoffs.
 
Selection committee had Ole **** and Miss St. in it's top 4. Yea, real knowledgeable guys in there. TCU is easily the best coached team in the country given their talent level.

We hired Radio when JJ recommended Gary P. Jesus what a horrible decade.
 
Notice how even with a big lead TCU is still playing aggressively both offensively and defensively. Unlike our ***** of a coach, they're not worried about losing the game.
 
Notice how even with a big lead TCU is still playing aggressively both offensively and defensively. Unlike our ***** of a coach, they're not worried about losing the game.

We don't play either even when we are losing.

Watching TCU is fun but also completely depressing at the same time.
 
Those Mississippi schools weren't overrated at allllllll.

Bama is the only real team in that mighty conference and they're no better than a handful of other teams.

Which team besides FSU and perhaps TCU can matchup with them?

I'm comfortable thinking Oregon or FSU beats them. I think OSU does too with a more stable QB situation. I already bet OSU +9 in their current state. And, as you mentioned, TCU matches up. I'd almost even be inclined to throw Baylor on a neutral field in the mix. There's 5 teams right there that I think could or would win on a neutral field. For all the "it's not about last season" talk FSU gets it sure seems to be all about the last decade or whatever when evaluating Bama this year.

Not to say you're wrong but OleMiss' OL>Oregon's OL, Mariota while the surperior QB would have the same problems Wallace is having. Ole Miss' defense is also surperior to Oregon's so it definitely would be a good game. Also not sure OSU can give TCU problems imo even with a healthy Miller.
 
This is why they need to go to an 8 team playoff. TCU got screwed.
 
Advertisement
I don't think they're as good defensively as Ole Miss' offense is making them look, but one thing is for sure: they always get more out of their individual defensive talent. That **** is great to watch.
 
As much as I despise Saban and Bama, I'm hoping they destroy Ohio State so that there is renewed discussion of TCU getting screwed over. Plus, F Urban Meyer and Ohio State.
 
Well, they're looking a heck of a lot better than Bama did against them.
I don't think they're as good defensively as Ole Miss' offence is making them look, but one thing is for sure: they always get more out of their individual defensive talent. That **** is great to watch.
 
So can our "beloved" slurpers on this board put to the rest that Miami's problems are solely based upon attrition and lack of talent. TCU and their avg class rank of 42nd during Golden's four year tenure here have flat out dominated the competition including now embarrassing a "high profiled" SEC team 42-3.

You know why???? COACHING. We have Gary Patterson coach this team and we might not ever lose a game during his tenure here. Golden brings in top 15 classes the last 3 yrs and he's complaining about Clouds, Moonlight, Cameras, and Wind as the reason why he can't get the job done here. FOH!
 
Of course ESPN is spinning it that Ole Miss wasn't motivated to be there. Couldn't be that they were less talented or out coached. I mean they are SEC right...
 
I just had a thought. Maybe the B1G10 told Wiscy to throw the game vs * to get * into the playoffs. Get that Playoff $.
 
Those Mississippi schools weren't overrated at allllllll.

Bama is the only real team in that mighty conference and they're no better than a handful of other teams.

Which team besides FSU and perhaps TCU can matchup with them?

I'm comfortable thinking Oregon or FSU beats them. I think OSU does too with a more stable QB situation. I already bet OSU +9 in their current state. And, as you mentioned, TCU matches up. I'd almost even be inclined to throw Baylor on a neutral field in the mix. There's 5 teams right there that I think could or would win on a neutral field. For all the "it's not about last season" talk FSU gets it sure seems to be all about the last decade or whatever when evaluating Bama this year.

Not to say you're wrong but OleMiss' OL>Oregon's OL, Mariota while the surperior QB would have the same problems Wallace is having. Ole Miss' defense is also surperior to Oregon's so it definitely would be a good game. Also not sure OSU can give TCU problems imo even with a healthy Miller.

I hate every team in the Playoff so it pains me to varying degrees to even debate one over another in hypotheticals. That said, I think Oregon would turn that game into a shootout and Bama wouldn't be able to keep up as their QB would finally be exposed. Nonetheless, you could be right too but my main point here is just that there are several teams in Bama's league and that the $EC was not only top-heavy but really had only one legit team.
 
Advertisement
TCU........WOW. 5 years ago they were nothing.....kind of like the U....PLEASE UM GET A REAL COACH.....GO CANES!
 
They completely botched the new playoffs. The only problem with the old BCS system were that there was always a debate that 3 and maybe 4 should be in with equal or even better record at times than the 1 and/or 2.

All they needed to do was 1. make the BCS calculations public so that we can ensure it was not being manipulated, because I have zero doubt that they were at times. 2. Create the playoff. Done.

Instead they created this panel that is actually worse than the BCS and creates a scenario full of bias and even more mystery to decision making than the BCS itself.
 
Back
Top