jerzeycane
All-ACC
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2012
- Messages
- 7,890
My Shalala criticism is that we've now hired three consecutive coaches, 14 years, of guys who don't lead in the aggressive, cutting edge way that made this program great. If you're worried about the school's brand, and you happen to be trying to build a Health District associated with the cutting edge, wouldn't you try to build the football program - essentially your organization's biggest marketing/branding tool - in a way that coincides? It's almost too easy. The school benefits and the football program benefits.
I don't blame her for Coker and Golden. She didn't want Coker, and Golden seemed like a good hire at the time. Shannon was not a good hire but our program was a mess and a lot of people turned us down. And while the buck stops with her, she's not a football person. Golden was really DiMare's choice.
That's my point. If she's not a football person, surround yourself with people who are. Dimare's influence should not be an excuse or a crutch. Ultimately, she is accountable.
Say Gary Patterson just simply says "I don't like the city of Miami and I don't like Palm Trees"
What does your wish list look like after that?
I don't have a wish list because I don't think Golden will be fired after this season. We'll see what progresses over the next year. It doesn't have to be a big name. I'll be looking for the next Patterson or Sumlin. They weren't the names they are now when they were possibilities for us. Both have had their ups and downs, but those were my choices in previous scenarios because they fit what I think coincides with this program's greatness: aggressively on the cutting edge of some aspect of football.
Well hopefully, our administration will in some way shape or form acknowledge the embarrassment.
If they do, a guy I've been keeping my eye on as the year goes on...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jzb9zHIypEA