- Joined
- Dec 14, 2013
- Messages
- 5,716
90s are considered one of most successful runs of any program/coach, no?FSU?- google AI done effed up on that one, I mean compared to Miami it’s not even close.
90s are considered one of most successful runs of any program/coach, no?FSU?- google AI done effed up on that one, I mean compared to Miami it’s not even close.
If you’re talking about Miami early 90s, leave the middle out, and then the end of the 90s into early 2000’s90s are considered one of most successful runs of any program/coach, no?
Sorry, I am talking about Bowden at FSU.If you’re talking about Miami early 90s, leave the middle out, and then the end of the 90s into early 2000’s
Sorry, I am talking about Bowden at FSU.
Edit-go ahead, take my keyboard away![]()
The key is he got to play with an unfair advantage. While the NCAA was slapping down anyone with a pulse over some free french fries, Saban had players literally flashing money on social media on a regular basis without even a concern since emmert was never going to look in their direction.Fine, I'll play devil's advocate. Saban's dynasty is a lot more impressive than anything our coaches did and sure, he paid players, but so did everyone else.
I guess you could argue that he didn't "build the template", but he actually built a real dynasty, our coaches built a national championship contender.
Don’t forget the Dodge dealerships!The key is he got to play with an unfair advantage. While the NCAA was slapping down anyone with a pulse over some free french fries, Saban had players literally flashing money on social media on a regular basis without even a concern since emmert was never going to look in their direction.
Meanwhile, Dez Bryant had lunch with Deion and pretty much sat out an entire season.Don’t forget the Dodge dealerships!
Not Saban, but Patrick PeterJohnsen and Sammy Watkins still make my blood boil.Meanwhile, Dez Bryant had lunch with Deion and pretty much sat out an entire season.
Not saying I disagree, just saying that Bama was hardly the only program paying players under the table (that tale is as old as time). He was to paying players what Lance Armstrong was to doping. Just institutionalized that stuff on another level.The key is he got to play with an unfair advantage. While the NCAA was slapping down anyone with a pulse over some free french fries, Saban had players literally flashing money on social media on a regular basis without even a concern since emmert was never going to look in their direction.
I'm not saying there's a real argument against him as GOAT coach, but he definitely got there partly due to an uneven playing field.
I make my unfair playing field statement with acknowledgment that he was actually a great coach as well. I think he'd have pulled some of those off on an even playing field, but the dynasty aspect went into overdrive when there was no risk of repercussions. Yes everyone was doing it, but bama bag game is about as legendary as the dynasty run itself.Not saying I disagree, just saying that Bama was hardly the only program paying players under the table (that tale is as old as time). He was to paying players what Lance Armstrong was to doping. Just institutionalized that stuff on another level.
But NOT everyone was doing it. Only certain schools were permitted to do it. That's the whole point.I make my unfair playing field statement with acknowledgment that he was actually a great coach as well. I think he'd have pulled some of those off on an even playing field, but the dynasty aspect went into overdrive when there was no risk of repercussions. Yes everyone was doing it, but bama bag game is about as legendary as the dynasty run itself.
Kirby caught the tail end of a golden era of bagmen and SEC not needing to follow any rules, and we see how quickly the momentum has fallen off now that it's an even playing field.
My initial reaction was to photocopy my ******* and tweet that GLORIOUS pic with "deez nutz", but Marc from IT said "that was against current HR policy to use company resources in such a manner".
I think it's a gray area.
@Felonious Monk
Actually, he'd be more likely to superimpose your picture on it and push it out as the company screensaver. There's a reason he's supervised.
Fine, I'll play devil's advocate. Saban's dynasty is a lot more impressive than anything our coaches did and sure, he paid players, but so did everyone else.
I guess you could argue that he didn't "build the template", but he actually built a real dynasty, our coaches built a national championship contender.
There’s always this little coincidence, while Bama was on probation and under investigation.The bolded part of your argument is the one I simply cannot abide.
Mark Emmert was President of the NCAA from 11/2010-3/2023. He was LSU Chancellor from 1999 to 2004, overlapping with Nick Saban's time as HC (11/1999-12/2004). While Emmert was NCAA President, the SEC (and mostly Bama) won the majority of Natties.
During Emmert's tenure, the NCAA conducted a painful investigation of UM utilizing a convicting Ponzi schemer's attorney to obtain evidence by improper methods and ultimately resulting in him firing his VP of Enforcement after that news surfaced in 2013. He also issued severe sanctions against Penn State following the Sandusky child abuse scandal. The NCAA also hit up Oregon in 2013 for reported violations involving improper benefits paid (under Chip Kelly). I'm sure there are other non-Bama schools I could list...
Meanwhile, Alabama's "pay for play" allegations and other improper benefits claims were never meaningfully penalized. When Yahoo Sports came out in 2013 and documented how DJ Fluker purportedly took money and other improper benefits at Alabama in 2012, nothing happened to Bama. There was also that Yahoo Sports article about supposedly Mark Barron taking money back in 2011 to keep him from declaring for the NFL draft, but nothing happened to Bama. I remember they also had a memorabilia selling report come out years ago that involved several players, including Trent Richardson among the alleged, but nothing happened to Bama. There was a report they even had an assistant strength coach placed on leave for purportedly providing Ha Ha Clinton-Dix with a "short-term loan", but nothing happened to Bama. And that doesn't even go into all of the "red Mustang" social media posts and other eyebrow-raising stuff with the program.
Oh, and by the way, who became Managing Director of Enforcement for the NCAA back in 2013? Alabama graduate Derrick Crawford (undergrad and law degrees from Bama).
So do not come in here with that tried, "so did everyone else" narrative. It seems obvious there were different rules for Bama.
SEC fans have a whole joke about how Missouri got all the punishments instead during Emmert's tenure. Here are just a couple.The bolded part of your argument is the one I simply cannot abide.
Mark Emmert was President of the NCAA from 11/2010-3/2023. He was LSU Chancellor from 1999 to 2004, overlapping with Nick Saban's time as HC (11/1999-12/2004). While Emmert was NCAA President, the SEC (and mostly Bama) won the majority of Natties.
During Emmert's tenure, the NCAA conducted a painful investigation of UM utilizing a convicting Ponzi schemer's attorney to obtain evidence by improper methods and ultimately resulting in him firing his VP of Enforcement after that news surfaced in 2013. He also issued severe sanctions against Penn State following the Sandusky child abuse scandal. The NCAA also hit up Oregon in 2013 for reported violations involving improper benefits paid (under Chip Kelly). I'm sure there are other non-Bama schools I could list...
Meanwhile, Alabama's "pay for play" allegations and other improper benefits claims were never meaningfully penalized. When Yahoo Sports came out in 2013 and documented how DJ Fluker purportedly took money and other improper benefits at Alabama in 2012, nothing happened to Bama. There was also that Yahoo Sports article about supposedly Mark Barron taking money back in 2011 to keep him from declaring for the NFL draft, but nothing happened to Bama. I remember they also had a memorabilia selling report come out years ago that involved several players, including Trent Richardson among the alleged, but nothing happened to Bama. There was a report they even had an assistant strength coach placed on leave for purportedly providing Ha Ha Clinton-Dix with a "short-term loan", but nothing happened to Bama. And that doesn't even go into all of the "red Mustang" social media posts and other eyebrow-raising stuff with the program.
Oh, and by the way, who became Managing Director of Enforcement for the NCAA back in 2013? Alabama graduate Derrick Crawford (undergrad and law degrees from Bama).
So do not come in here with that tried, "so did everyone else" narrative. It seems obvious there were different rules for Bama.
The bolded part of your argument is the one I simply cannot abide.
Mark Emmert was President of the NCAA from 11/2010-3/2023. He was LSU Chancellor from 1999 to 2004, overlapping with Nick Saban's time as HC (11/1999-12/2004). While Emmert was NCAA President, the SEC (and mostly Bama) won the majority of Natties.
During Emmert's tenure, the NCAA conducted a painful investigation of UM utilizing a convicting Ponzi schemer's attorney to obtain evidence by improper methods and ultimately resulting in him firing his VP of Enforcement after that news surfaced in 2013. He also issued severe sanctions against Penn State following the Sandusky child abuse scandal. The NCAA also hit up Oregon in 2013 for reported violations involving improper benefits paid (under Chip Kelly). I'm sure there are other non-Bama schools I could list...
Meanwhile, Alabama's "pay for play" allegations and other improper benefits claims were never meaningfully penalized. When Yahoo Sports came out in 2013 and documented how DJ Fluker purportedly took money and other improper benefits at Alabama in 2012, nothing happened to Bama. There was also that Yahoo Sports article about supposedly Mark Barron taking money back in 2011 to keep him from declaring for the NFL draft, but nothing happened to Bama. I remember they also had a memorabilia selling report come out years ago that involved several players, including Trent Richardson among the alleged, but nothing happened to Bama. There was a report they even had an assistant strength coach placed on leave for purportedly providing Ha Ha Clinton-Dix with a "short-term loan", but nothing happened to Bama. And that doesn't even go into all of the "red Mustang" social media posts and other eyebrow-raising stuff with the program.
Oh, and by the way, who became Managing Director of Enforcement for the NCAA back in 2013? Alabama graduate Derrick Crawford (undergrad and law degrees from Bama).
So do not come in here with that tried, "so did everyone else" narrative. It seems obvious there were different rules for Bama.
There weren't even any Benihana's steaks. Those were receipts from unrelated meals that he threw in to blame on us. He had $75 Benihanas receipts and tried saying that was meals for multiple football players.A thousand times this.
People apparently just don’t get the unequal enforcement that went on during SEC dominance. Mark Emmert himself didn’t rule out the possibility of the death penalty during our emerging “scandal“. For what? Some cheap Benihana steaks and a boat ride.
Meanwhile, obvious and incontrovertible evidence came out during this period, of SEC schools, especially Alabama, paying players with cash and cars. Julio Jones getting thousands of dollars worth of free suits and clothes in Tuscaloosa. I can go on and on.
All of this is documented. Not one single thing was done.
Meanwhile, we’re in Miami sweating out whether we were even going to have a football program. Top recruits wouldn’t even consider us.Everybody knew what was happening, even in media, especially ESPN. It was all a wink and a smile then.
That’s why I don’t get why people complain about NIL. We literally had no chance at doing, for example, what we did in the 2015 season, the way things were without NIL. I know the current system is not perfect, maybe it can be improved, but we had no chance otherwise.
A thousand times this.
People apparently just don’t get the unequal enforcement that went on during SEC dominance. Mark Emmert himself didn’t rule out the possibility of the death penalty during our emerging “scandal“. For what? Some cheap Benihana steaks and a boat ride.
Meanwhile, obvious and incontrovertible evidence came out during this period, of SEC schools, especially Alabama, paying players with cash and cars. Julio Jones getting thousands of dollars worth of free suits and clothes in Tuscaloosa. I can go on and on.
All of this is documented. Not one single thing was done.
Meanwhile, we’re in Miami sweating out whether we were even going to have a football program. Top recruits wouldn’t even consider us.Everybody knew what was happening, even in media, especially ESPN. It was all a wink and a smile then.
That’s why I don’t get why people complain about NIL. We literally had no chance at doing, for example, what we did in the 2015 season, the way things were without NIL. I know the current system is not perfect, maybe it can be improved, but we had no chance otherwise.
There weren't even any Benihana's steaks. Those were receipts from unrelated meals that he threw in to blame on us. He had $75 Benihanas receipts and tried saying that was meals for multiple football players.
The whole thing was a classic fraudulent conveyance case. He was just trying to use us as a scapegoat so that he didn't have to pay creditors back, and as a bonus he got to make us look bad. Tim Reynolds said the forensic accounting totaled $4500 in actual benefits and it was just the used appliances and that ****.
Add Dabo to the dumbass trifecta. Again, I'm still bitter about Sammy Watkins and those social media posts of cash.The elevation of "above-the-table" contractual compensation over "under-the-table bags" may go down as the most anti-SEC, pro-UM move in NCAAF history. And Mark Emmert (who infamously called NIL "an existential threat") and Nick Saban fought against it tooth and nail. ****, Nick's still speaking and fighting against it.
Put it this way: if there was a policy change being discussed that I knew absolutely nothing about, but you told me "Mark Emmert and Nick Saban are against it," I would tell you it's good for Miami and we should for on the opposite side of them.