My son trained under Swasey. He he thought he was a great mentor and very good college coach. I always had arguments with him about our players not as strong compared to SEC players. He always defended him while I always wanted him to be replace. His argument was always about how good Swasey was to young players with little or no parenteral guidance at home. He said Swasey was a father figure to many football players and had positive influence on their lives, etc.....
My son views explain, at least partially, Swasey's popularity among players and ex-canes. It doesn't justify his retention as head of S&C program which is in dire need of massive upgrade in the strength department. Richt has to look at it from on-field result prospective. Someone else on the staff can serve that father figure role.
This right here is why i think he was so well liked and thought of around Miami.....more for his mentoring/personal relationships than his S&C skill. The S&C coach is the ONLY coach who is with these guys year round, especially during the summer. If he's a good dude, and all accounts are that he was, he is probably looked upon as a father figure to many kids (or at least a close uncle/friend) and that is why it's tough for many to see him go. He seemed like he was a much better speed/agility guy than he was a strength/conditioning coach. People can blame Golden all they want and rightfully so, the things this staff did to Perryman, Duke, Yearby and others took away from their skills in my books. But the S&C coach has the final say on the exercises and workout programs, and these kids were either too weak/soft during the Shannon era, or too big, stiff and slow during the Golden era. At some point, the S&C program will be looked at and changed.
I'm not sure what Swasey is paid, but it would have been ok with me to keep him on staff in some capacity but UNDER the supervision of a top notch S&C guy.