Mackmiller974
All ACC
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2017
- Messages
- 8,075
Well deserved for the chiefs
Eagles would have got the ball back with 1 timeout and about 1:20 left. I would say yes it changed the game. It also robbed footballs fans everywhere of a better finishIt was a total **** call, but, did it really change the game? They would’ve still highly likely kicked a field goal.
It was 3rd down, so Eagles would’ve had 1:40 or so instead of 8 seconds.It was a total **** call, but, did it really change the game? They would’ve still highly likely kicked a field goal.
Its a shame. Had the refs not ****ed up the earlier calls, I think the Chefs would be in command of this game. The catch and fumble for a Chefs TD that was overturned was a bad call. That was a catch and fumble. The 3rd down bobble that was ruled a catch and confirmed upon challenge was a fraudulent call. That was incomplete.
Instead everyone will walk away thinking the refs handed the game to the Chefs. Let the endless **** talk begin.
Philly would’ve had time to run some plays though and get in a position to kick for overtime.It was a total **** call, but, did it really change the game? They would’ve still highly likely kicked a field goal.
Not this way. But it’s only my opinion.Well deserved for the chiefs
Eagles would have got the ball back with 1 timeout and about 1:20 left. I would say yes it changed the game. It also robbed footballs fans everywhere of a better finish
How do Eagles fans have any leg to stand on? I literally thought at one point in the game the refs were throwing the game in favor of the Eagles. The cb held JuJu. A couple times within that same play. The better team won.I’m not a bad sport, but on my mama, if I’m an Eagles, man, I’m getting a $50k fine cursing out the refs on my way to the locker room & not shaking anyone’s hand from KC. This was absolute bull chit.
Yep , with a timeout and both teams couldn’t stop the other. But like I said ” oh well“It was 3rd down, so Eagles would’ve had 1:40 or so instead of 8 seconds.
The one where he held Schuster? If that's the one you're talking about, then yeah. He grabbed him twice on the play.@filmcane so you good with that call?
Leave me out of this. I'm an innocent bystander.
Philly would’ve had time to run some plays though and get in a position to kick for overtime.
Okay so the refs weren’t in bad then rightThe one where he held Schuster? If that's the one you're talking about, then yeah. He grabbed him twice on the play.
Deprived Philly and football fans everywhere of a do-or-die drive w the game on the line.It was a total **** call, but, did it really change the game? They would’ve still highly likely kicked a field goal.
Ball was snapped at 1:54 on that 3rd down.Yeah, maybe, look at my previous post. I don’t remember what the down was or how much time was left.