Vegas’ goal is to equal money on both sides.Sometimes they will artificially inflate or deflate a line to accomplish this.This seems like one of those times.
People have watched us play down to our competition all year and they were probably loading up on Pitt plus the 14-.Now Vegas is dropping it under the 2 tds to get money to the Miami side.
Only other thing that moves a line like that is an injury to the QB or RB if it’s a team that relays on one.Neither of those have happened or we would have heard about it.
This
No, actually this is wholly inaccurate. "Vegas wants equal money on both sides" is the biggest myth ever, somehow perpetuated over time by people without a clue. If a bookmaker's bankroll is sufficient, why would he move a number that has attracted an inordinate amount of money from huge squares? Bookmakers view each game as an independent event. Savvy bookmakers with large enough bankrolls view each game as just one part of a larger series. The bookmaker will win exactly 50% of those imbalanced games, and therefore it plays out mathematically as though every game had balanced action. However, by not moving the pointspread, the bookmaker earns himself 4-5x the profit (vig) than by employing the foolish strategy of trying to get equal money on both sides.
Your way (with a 2 game scenario):
Game 1
$10,000 on Miami -13
$90,000 on Pitt +13
Your way suggests it is smart for the bookmaker to call of $80k of action and guarantee himself $1k profit in vig.
Game 2
$90,000 on Bama -4.5
$10,000 on Auburn +4.5
Your way again suggests calling off $80,000 (80% of your action!) in order to guarantee yourself $1k in profit. According to your way, the bookmaker/Vegas has zero risk and guarantees itself a grant total of $2k profit on a $220k, a hold of just 1%.
The sharp bookmaker's way, given a large enough bankroll:
Game 1
$10,000 on Miami -13
$90,000 on Pitt +13
Game 2
$90,000 on Bama -4.5
$10,000 on Auburn +4.5
The mathematically savvy bookmaker keeps it all, expecting to win 50% of the games regardless of how heavy or imbalanced the action is. He splits here, losing $79k on the Bama game [i.e. The heavy money side bets Bama and Bama wins by 5 or more, so the bookmaker pays out $90k, but collects $10k plus $1k in vig from Auburn bettors] and winning $89k on the Miami game [i.e. The heavy money side bets Pitt and Pitt gets blown out by Miami, so the bookmaker nets $90k + $9k vig - $10k], for a net profit of $10k on $220k of action [-$79k + $89k], including vig (a net hold of 4.54%).
Numbers don't lie, forget that "Vegas wants equal money on both sides" nonsense. It's right up there with "Santa Claus is real".