Guess it was a sell the news event!PSQH tomorrow.
Possible sell the news type. However, Caitlin long took orbs 1500% on Sept 8.
View attachment 337147View attachment 337148
Yes, if the Fed gets more aggressive with rate cutting.Bottom line it for me, we fuccin or naw?
Yes, if the Fed gets more aggressive with rate cutting.
Wild chart. Economy powered by clanker hopes and dreams
So I think ur concerns are spot on, and I agree there will be a massive reckoning on AI at some point (hopefully less severe than dotcom bust), but I think any correction in near term in direct AI and related names (growth Utilities like Vistra and CEG, etc) is going to be a great buying opportunity for next couple of years at least. The only solution to allay the fears that AI spend hasn't been productive to date is to spend even more on AI, IMO.As much as I love what I see from AI, I can’t see the pay off in the near term. Maybe 3-5 years vs 3-5 quarters. Sure there will be some winners but the hype of AI integrations with the transactional world of Web 2.0 is not going to be quick or easy.
I believe we see a correction that may be a major one. Like where Bessett and Trump are taking things but it will take time. I’m also concerned with how Fd our congress is. That could lead to more wasteful spending, debts…
The debt issue is a massive one even if GDP hits 4-5% and inflation drops below 1%. This will ripple into real estate and other sectors that Will have an impact on jobs along with AI causing layoffs. This is the big shoe that drops causing a recession and potential bubble burst in equities, real estate…So I think ur concerns are spot on, and I agree there will be a massive reckoning on AI at some point (hopefully less severe than dotcom bust), but I think any correction in near term in direct AI and related names (growth Utilities like Vistra and CEG, etc) is going to be a great buying opportunity for next couple of years at least. The only solution to allay the fears that AI spend hasn't been productive to date is to spend even more on AI, IMO.
3-5 years??? You already see it. It is happening in science and hospitals. Engineers are using it in tech. Waymo cars are all because of Ai. We are in 1997 of the internet or 2006 in the smart phone. But by next year we will be in 2000 in internet or 2010 in smartphone. The only thing holding it back is the build out and energy needed.As much as I love what I see from AI, I can’t see the pay off in the near term. Maybe 3-5 years vs 3-5 quarters. Sure there will be some winners but the hype of AI integrations with the transactional world of Web 2.0 is not going to be quick or easy.
I believe we see a correction that may be a major one. Like where Bessett and Trump are taking things but it will take time. I’m also concerned with how Fd our congress is. That could lead to more wasteful spending, debts…
3-5 years??? You already see it. It is happening in science and hospitals. Engineers are using it in tech. Waymo cars are all because of Ai. We are in 1997 of the internet or 2006 in the smart phone. But by next year we will be in 2000 in internet or 2010 in smartphone. The only thing holding it back is the build out and energy needed.
3-5 years??? You already see it. It is happening in science and hospitals. Engineers are using it in tech. Waymo cars are all because of Ai. We are in 1997 of the internet or 2006 in the smart phone. But by next year we will be in 2000 in internet or 2010 in smartphone. The only thing holding it back is the build out and energy needed.
You'd have Cosmos and Epic Research would be using that data.A common quote in technology:
Humans grossly overestimate what can be done in 1 month and grossly underestimate what can be done in 10 years.
We normally see the break even of correct estimates at around 3yrs.
Waymo has been using it for a long long time and still aren’t able to claim it works properly all the time. They just keep chipping away. In 3-5 years, it very well may finally have enough data and ability to replace humans with better results everywhere not just the markets they can control environments more. Tesla is taking a much broader approach allowing use out of controlled environments. When you can take any of these cars to a third world country with success, you can then claim AI has won. If you have driven in a third world country, you’d understand how uncomfortable those driving environments are compared to the USA.
There are far more places besides cars that will allow AI to impact gdp sooner. Robotics in factories. Ai in software. Integration of data into AI agents allowing humans to use one agent for more data access. Example: MyChart is epic, what if you could query ChatGPT to get all your MyChart data so you don’t have to login to 3,4,20 providers (as you age) to see historical trends or imaging. This will happen but it isn’t quick
I have a friend ask me to research it. He went through a good health care exit and thinks this is a big opportunity especially if consumers allow the sharing of data. No one has a good line of sight in long term data due to laws and lack of good technology. Epic is just one of many players and the starting point. The MCP if built would need to expand into other portal providers.You'd have Cosmos and Epic Research would be using that data.
![]()
Epic Cosmos
A Universe of Data that Drives Evidence-Based Research and Individualized Patient Care. Cosmos combines billions of clinical data points in a way that forms a high-quality, representative, and integrated data set that can be used to change the health and lives of people everywhere. Health system...cosmos.epic.com
I could talk for days about the difficulty making that happen. It's what keeps me employed.I have a friend ask me to research it. He went through a good health care exit and thinks this is a big opportunity especially if consumers allow the sharing of data. No one has a good line of sight in long term data due to laws and lack of good technology. Epic is just one of many players and the starting point. The MCP if built would need to expand into other portal providers.
Even with how great an idea it is, 3-5quarters is not happening but 3-5years is more likely.I could talk for days about the difficulty making that happen. It's what keeps me employed.