- Joined
- Dec 20, 2021
- Messages
- 5,598
Again, street-level insults without a shred of football talk. Is that what works in your world?A clue.
Again, street-level insults without a shred of football talk. Is that what works in your world?A clue.
When someone shows you who they are believe them.Again, street-level insults without a shred of football talk. Is that what works in your world?
When someone shows you who they are believe them.
The last 5 games were Ga Tech, UNC, Clemson, Virginia, and Nc State. Someone else fumbled against UNC.Muffed punt TAMU
11 which is still way too many!16 turnovers in 5 games. 12 for Van Golfer, 1 on a goal line fumble by Parrish and 1 by Chaney which should have never happened in the first place.
It's insane. I believe they only had 3 turnovers leading up to the Ga Tech game.11 which is still way too many!
That's a slippery slope. If the guy who is committing penalties also lights up any ball carrier who enters his space, you live with a few penalties.Penalties are mental mistakes. A coach can decide how many mistakes he is willing to accept before pulling kids who produce too many mental mistakes. Mario clearly needs to lower the threshold.
If we are at DEFCON 1 with turnovers (I agree) then the only solution right now is to make a QB change ASAP.The penalties are absorbable. There are many, many, many historical data points of very good football teams being ranked towards the bottom of the league in penalties.
Turnovers are a completely different discussion. Almost no teams ever have significantly negative turnover margins and win a lot of games. I'm not saying I'm happy with the penalties, but IMO the penalties are about a 3/10 concern while the turnovers are a 10/10, or worse. We're at DEFCON 1 with the turnovers.
That's a slippery slope. If the guy who is committing penalties also lights up any ball carrier who enters his space, you live with a few penalties.
We aren’t the only one’s looking at this. The players are the one reallyyyyyyyy looking closely at this.
Can someone do a turnover per player lookup and then we can decide who to blame.Miami is now 126th in the nation in turnovers. Terrible for any team, poison for a team that is trying to run the ball and play complementary football.
And this is not to blame one player- it is a team stat that falls on the players and coaches.
You are arguing against a point I never made. Yes you can win in spite of penalties. You can also win in spite of turnovers. The point is they both fall on the coaches. Never allow anything in a win you wouldn't allow in a loss. The coaches should be correcting both issues with either personnel changes or diciplinary actions. I don't understand the disagreement.The penalties are absorbable. There are many, many, many historical data points of very good football teams being ranked towards the bottom of the league in penalties.
Turnovers are a completely different discussion. Almost no teams ever have significantly negative turnover margins and win a lot of games. I'm not saying I'm happy with the penalties, but IMO the penalties are about a 3/10 concern while the turnovers are a 10/10, or worse. We're at DEFCON 1 with the turnovers.
That is also a slippery slope on the other side when a player isn't lighting up the other team like TVD with turnovers or K Smith with penalties on ST.
**** this team & **** the coaches!Miami is now 126th in the nation in turnovers. Terrible for any team, poison for a team that is trying to run the ball and play complementary football.
And this is not to blame one player- it is a team stat that falls on the players and coaches.
TVD plays like he’s scared!Miami is now 126th in the nation in turnovers. Terrible for any team, poison for a team that is trying to run the ball and play complementary football.
And this is not to blame one player- it is a team stat that falls on the players and coaches.