CaneinBroward
Recruit
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2016
- Messages
- 6,898
Any chance the defensive stats decline due to the new offense being put into play? Scoring faster, less time off the clock on drives, quick 3 and outs at times, etc.
analytics also said we were a good football team last year while we were losing to UNC and GT and scraping by Central Michigan
We basically got blown out at orange bowl site by FIU. We were straight trash homey! **** a analyticanalytics also said we were a good football team last year while we were losing to UNC and GT and scraping by Central Michigan
Need to be playing with the lead so the DL can shine. Then nickel CB and overall CB depth are the only concerns.
Teams that keep the score close and have fusion with the run/pass game could give the LBs major problems. 55 and 56 had issues with gap integrity and coverage assignments and it's likely only getting worse.
That's what I'm saying our DLINe is gonna make life easier on our secondary and I think Huff and Brooks are gonna be the 2 best linebackers we've had around here in a while!! Much better than Shaq and pink and that's no disrespect at all it's big shoes to fill but those youngins are just good and fast! They were both alpha males in HS! The first time I saw Sam Brooks was the game he tore his ACL his Jr year and I think he had like 8 tackles 5 tkl and and 3 sacks and the game wasn't over he was by the best player on the field dude was underated because of the injury should have been a 5* imo! Huff is elite also I'm excited to see those two!
Returning LB production has the weakest correlation to defensive success. Analytic models will factor that in when doing projections. Or at least they should.
Sports world has gone stat crazy. Not saying it is wrong because they are best available predictor of what is to come. They do not allow for the fact any given game could be a huge outlier. Why I take stats with a grain of salt and use my eye test during the game itself and try not to get overly optimistic before any game
analytics also said we were a good football team last year while we were losing to UNC and GT and scraping by Central Michigan
Basically no experience at LB and very underwhelming at DT.. I would expect growing pains at times and if someone up the middle steps up defense will be solid again
We can micro-analyze our defense to death but the reality for this team hasn't changed. Week in and week out, with very few exceptions, they will play a solid game and hold opposing offenses well below their season averages in yards and points.
Field a decent, consistent offense and we will win 10+ games. It was the case last season and the season before that.
We basically got blown out at orange bowl site by FIU. We were straight trash homey! **** a analytic
Need to be playing with the lead so the DL can shine. Then nickel CB and overall CB depth are the only concerns.
Teams that keep the score close and have fusion with the run/pass game could give the LBs major problems. 55 and 56 had issues with gap integrity and coverage assignments and it's likely only getting worse.
If analytics without context were useful, data scientists wouldn't exist.analytics also said we were a good football team last year while we were losing to UNC and GT and scraping by Central Michigan
What has high correlation among the position groups?
*Flawed analytics
The person saying Miami was good last year despite results was Bill Connelly and his SP+, the whose formula says we'll be good next year and is the focus of this thread.If analytics without context were useful, data scientists wouldn't exist.
We definitely need some early season blowouts to get our sophomore DBs some burn
I’m much more concerned about LB depth
McCloud will be great at LB
Brooks should be good too