Just so y'all know ... Suggesting that Golden had anything to do with how well we played during that 3 game stretch is also suggesting that he could be the right man for the job.
If he could create a game-plan to deliver those results over a multi-game stretch, then it is possible he could also see that success and decide to implement the same tactics more frequently.
What likely happened, IMO ... Is that those 3 teams were not very good. We got out fast, made them pass heavy, and our D was up to the task because they didn't have to worry much about the run game.
On the FSU topic ... They were a notoriously bad 1st half team, unlike the year before, when they dominated early. We were not the only team they struggled against in the 1st half last season.
And regarding Golden, specifically ... He coaches "not to lose", instead of coaching "to win". That's been his style since Day 1 at Miami. Those 3 games we are talking about were perfect storms, and are the exception because of circumstances, not some coaching philosophy change.
Those team folded on their coaching staffs, and our talent advantage made those games look easy.
Pitt, UVA, and South Carolina all came to play the full game ... Our talent advantage didn't matter to them.