hoops156
Senior
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2011
- Messages
- 26,369
I always thought a two quarterback system could work and wondered why more teams did not do it when they had talented quarterbacks with completely different skill sets.
The biggest argument I heard against it was for leadership purposes, but I always felt you could get leadership from the position room and not just one guy.
As I looked more into it, I found that even when both guys were leaders and did not divide the team into cliques, that there were technical issues that made coaches shy away from it. Things like problems with cadence, handling the snap, and receiver timing.
I wish there was a way to make it work. Having multiple, talented guys who can start is a great problem to have. Quarterback is the only position where you will be buried on the bench with almost no playing time for a guy slightly outperforming you.
Makes it near impossible to build depth at the position in college. It makes you one injury away from disaster now more than ever. Syracuse had Dabo ****tin his pants when they banged up Lawrence last year.
the days of depth at the QB spot and sitting and learning are over. all across CFB we saw a lot more freshman QBs play right away. if you have a good QB, you just gotta play him asap bc of the threat of the transfer. in terms of clemson, they had just lost three Qbs in a season or something. they were always going to be flirting with disaster the moment they went full time to sunshine and that was the right move no matter what, depth be damned.