forums

Shemar Stewart

Advertisement
Memnon said:
The LAST thing I would be asking her is questions about Shemar...
Click to expand...


giphy.gif
 
AUcane said:
Can someone explain his Trey comment about 1% wrong? Fuzzy math.
Click to expand...
Trey is still under contract for this season. They’ve offered him 28 mill a year and he’s turning it down. This is the third year in a row Trey has done this. And people aren’t taking into account that the bengals were criticized for originally overpaying him when they first acquired him in free agency.
 
Shogungts said:
Honestly, I think it is kinda messed up that there are rookie set terms. I understand why they did it - both teams and established players were upset that unproven players were coming in getting huge contracts and often busting <cough> Sam Bradford <cough> - but looking at the other side of it, it seems pretty unfair that players are collectively bargaining terms that hurt future players that are not able to be part of those conversations.
Click to expand...
Oh poor us, we're multi-millionaires at age 21-22. I'd gladly take those terms for 4-5 years in my career. We pretty much all begin our careers (and really throughout) based on industry norms that are set by other people and we have little say in. You get an offer, sure you can negotiate a bit, but for the most part it's still fairly slotted in a set range.

The issue here isn't the numbers, it's the shady clauses the Bengals are trying to put in to void guarantees easier.
 
I know it seems impossible, but if somehow, Shemar returns to college for one year. (Didn't the NCAA admit when the Lucas/Wisconson issue was raised, players can transfer whenever they want?)

If Shemar is available for one more year of college - should we try to add him to our roster?

Just asking.....
 
Advertisement
Bengals pretty dumb. They going to try this clause eliminating all guarantees with THESE two??
How was this not in his profile? Common knowledge.

They wanna go cheap they should have drafted someone else. Period.

I’m still surprised he went as high as he did, even with his combine numbers. Literally no production to back it up.
Mike Mamula with barely a fraction of Mike Mamula college production.
 
Advertisement
Memnon said:
No he doesn't.

No team is going to draft him in the 1st round again if he doesn't play his rookie season this year.

He can sit out the whole year & reenter the draft if he wants to, he will not go 1st round in 2026.

Take that to the bank & deposit it.
100% guarantee, wouldn't happen.
Click to expand...

Isn't this what Bo Jackson did? I get the issue was not $ related, rather he did not want to play for the Bucs because they screwed him over and he lost his final season of baseball at Auburn. But he just didn't sign with them. He then signed a baseball contract, and later decided to play football after the raiders drafted him late in the following draft.
 
JG14 said:
Isn't this what Bo Jackson did? I get the issue was not $ related, rather he did not want to play for the Bucs because they screwed him over and he lost his final season of baseball at Auburn. But he just didn't sign with them. He then signed a baseball contract, and later decided to play football after the raiders drafted him late in the following draft.
Click to expand...
It’s also what Craig Erickson did, because his draft stock took such a hit with his injury. I think he went in the 5th round in his first draft.

He didn’t sign, recovered, and went in the 4th round the following year to the Bucs.
 
Back
Top