forums

Shalala

BALLHAWKU said:
You dont think she knew this was dirty money? As the leader of the school she should be held responsible for bringing Nevin in the picture
Click to expand...

You're an elite kind of stupid.

The guy scammed a billion dollars and evaded the FBI for eight years. But you think Donna Shalala should have cracked the case when he handed her a check at a bowling alley?

The fact that you posted an article from the Miami New Times should be enough to convince you to seek counseling.
 
Advertisement
Antwan, nice join in jan 2014.

You bring nothing to the table whatsoever. It appears your only position on this board is blind defiance in support of Shalala. Give up the minimum wage job, and I will employ you to merely stop trolling this board.
 
theu4lyfe said:
Antwan, nice join in jan 2014.

You bring nothing to the table whatsoever. It appears your only position on this board is blind defiance in support of Shalala. Give up the minimum wage job, and I will employ you to merely stop trolling this board.
Click to expand...

FAMU offense >>>> theu4lyfe's attempt at smack

Just a terrible effort.
 
nycane said:
Will this women be leaving the school anytime soon? She is a liberal political academic. she belongs at a state school, not a for profit private institution
Click to expand...

The University of Miami is a not-for profit institution. Here is a corroborative link:

http://www6.miami.edu/generalcounsel/faqs.html#1

From the link:

1. The University of Miami is a not-for-profit corporation, duly recognized as a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization....
 
Last edited:
Real world, not-for-profit university is different than a not-for-profit charity. Although the University does not classify themsellf as a for-profit entity for the IRS, you are an ostrich putting your head in the ground; something akin to Al Golden on the sidelines.

This entire university, including Donna Shalala, has a financial incenfive in the success and profitability of the university, not to mention their salaries. Just because they file as a not-for-profit entity with the government, does not make it not-for-profit
 
Last edited:
Wow. So this is what happens when you engage the idiots on this board.
no-words-homer-into-brush.gif
 
AntwanJ306 said:
zoisgod said:
going by your panzy stance you are an alum that frowns upon people that care more about UM football than academics
Click to expand...

Uh, I absolutely frown upon people who think like that. People who care more about UM football than UM's academic stature are ignored in real life. Donna Shalala is one of the best presidents in the country. No one in the UM administration owes you anything just because you want to "rep da U".
Click to expand...

You do realize there are several schools who are better in academics and football than Miami right now right? **** Shalala.

hHOjt.gif
 
Advertisement
theu4lyfe said:
Real world, not-for-profit university is different than a not-for-profit charity. Although the University does not classify themsellf as a for-profit entity for the IRS, you are an ostrich putting your head in the ground; something akin to Al Golden on the sidelines.

This entire university, including Donna Shalala, has a financial incenfive in the success and profitability of the university, not to mention their salaries. Just because they file as a not-for-profit entity with the government, does not make it not-for-profit
Click to expand...

theu4lyfe,
My post #84 was just meant as a response to the OP description of UM as "a for profit" institution. To my, perhaps naive, way of thinking the terms "for profit" and "not-for-profit" seem to connote a difference.
 
AntwanJ306 said:
BALLHAWKU said:
You dont think she knew this was dirty money? As the leader of the school she should be held responsible for bringing Nevin in the picture
Click to expand...

You're an elite kind of stupid.

The guy scammed a billion dollars and evaded the FBI for eight years. But you think Donna Shalala should have cracked the case when he handed her a check at a bowling alley?

The fact that you posted an article from the Miami New Times should be enough to convince you to seek counseling.
Click to expand...

Your the one who is stupid if you dont think shalala knew that was dirty money.
 
RDCane said:
AntwanJ306 said:
RDCane said:
You do realize there are several schools who are better in academics and football than Miami right now right? **** Shalala.
Click to expand...

And what does that have to do with anything?
Click to expand...

The point is that a president can be effective at promoting both academics and athletics.
Click to expand...

Which she does. Only the idiots on this board believe that we didn't have an effective offense last week because Donna Shalala is the president of the school.
 
theu4lyfe said:
Real world, not-for-profit university is different than a not-for-profit charity. Although the University does not classify themsellf as a for-profit entity for the IRS, you are an ostrich putting your head in the ground; something akin to Al Golden on the sidelines.

This entire university, including Donna Shalala, has a financial incenfive in the success and profitability of the university, not to mention their salaries. Just because they file as a not-for-profit entity with the government, does not make it not-for-profit
Click to expand...

UM is not trying to make a profit. What are you talking about?

You quite frankly don't know what the **** you're talking about. There is nothing about UM that is "for profit." There aren't shareholders that benefit financially if UM brings in a lot of money. There aren't dividends paid out. Profits aren't returned to shareholders, because there are no shareholders.

There's an endowment, which is akin to a trust, meant to benefit the university only, and decisions involving the the endowment are made by a board of trustees and some of those decisions are delegated to Shalala and other university administrators.

Again, people should stop using words when they don't know what they mean. "not for profit" does not mean that the entity does not try to bring in money.
 
Last edited:
theu4lyfe said:
Antwan, nice join in jan 2014.

You bring nothing to the table whatsoever. It appears your only position on this board is blind defiance in support of Shalala. Give up the minimum wage job, and I will employ you to merely stop trolling this board.
Click to expand...

wonder if this is shalala
 
Huh? They are trying to redline--and have more expenses than revenue?

A not-for-profit entity derives their operational budget from charitable donations, hence fundraising.

Please do not try to compare University of Miami with the Red Cross. If so, my brother--along with the other 400 students who scored a 159 on their LSAT--deserve their 140K back.
 
Advertisement
theu4lyfe said:
Huh? They are trying to redline--and have more expenses than revenue?

A not-for-profit entity derives their operational budget from charitable donations, hence fundraising.

Please do not try to compare University of Miami with the Red Cross. If so, my brother--along with the other 400 students who scored a 159 on their LSAT--deserve their 140K back.
Click to expand...

You don't know what not for profit means. Stop using legal terms of art when you have no clue what they actually mean. Nobody is comparing UM to a charity, except you, because you don't know what you're talking about.
 
Read my other posts about being an ostrich. You are right..... There are no shareholders, and no dividends. Nobody said it was.

If there were, they would not file as a not-for-profit University with the IRS.

Again, read my post from earlier, ostrich. Simply because you don't identify yourself as a corporation, does not make yourself not for profit.

You are an idiot
 
Lol Shalalalalala is at the TKA concert in Magic City Casino. Don't know how to post a pic from my phone.

Yelled "Thank you for killing Miami football" and she just waved.
 
theu4lyfe said:
Read my other posts about being an ostrich. You are right..... There are no shareholders, and no dividends. Nobody said it was.

If there were, they would not file as a not-for-profit University with the IRS.

Again, read my post from earlier, ostrich. Simply because you don't identify yourself as a corporation, does not make yourself not for profit.

You are an idiot
Click to expand...

Again, you don't know what you're talking about. Not-for-profit is a legal term of art that means an entity's owners don't derive a profit. In UM's case, there are no real "owners" and nobody derives a profit if UM does well. Thus, it is a "not for profit." Not-for-profit doesn't mean whatever the **** you want it to mean. It has nothing to do with whether you define yourself as a "corporation"--there are plenty of entities organized as corporations that are not-for-profit.

It's okay, you can admit that sometimes you don't have to know everything and that you can be wrong.
 
Back
Top