Consigliere
All-American
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 21,927
i can not stand some of our fans.
before you comments on the job the president of a university has done, stop listening to the Lukes of this fan base and start doing some research.
we are NOT Alabama, if you want the entire school admin to be focused around the football program go cheer for Ohio State, LCU, Alabama & FSU..
Foot... the president when UM had the best team in college football history .. .he wanted to shut down the football program!
Our football program is a small part of our entire school system and it will NEVER be how it is in Alabama or FSU. We are a small privet school and the only reason we are able to have a good team in the past is because of the talent around the city.
Any president that steps foot on this campus will be hired by the trustees to better the university not the football program & if you can't comprehends that you should not be commenting on this subject.
Shalala has brought in more money for this school then anyone in history of this program and that has helped this football program. If you want to fire Golden, or you want to hire a better coach.. that will cost you a pretty penny.. and guess what!? your not going to pay for it.. the school is.
Either way.. the program with our program is NOT the president of the university (i still can't believe I have to type that because some of you believe everything Luke tweets) its with our staff, and you don't make decisions like this after 2 games! you wait out at the VERY least half way through the season.
Shalala put this program milestones ahead of every other school in the state..she raised billions! (yes with a b) and she does not hire or fire the coach...there is a long chain this goes through and even if she wants to fire him, the trustees have to approve it..
Three things:
1. President and their Job
I get what you're saying about the President and their job. I think she was an incredible President for the school minus football and baseball. Since this is a sports message board, this will be what most focus on.
My problem is that she was WAY TOO hands on (hiring/firing) for someone who knows nothing about the issues involved (bringing in proper coaches). She could have instead, hired a AD who was ACTUALLY in charge of the Athletic Department and free to make decisions without the President's 2 Cents. Instead she is a bit of a micro-manager.
So Shalala was excellent for the SCHOOL as a WHOLE but not so much for sports. Who cares at this point, she is done and we're moving on. There is no need to continue the amount of impact she has had on athletics because she is STEPPING DOWN. It is irrelevant at this point.
2. Good football v. Good Academics.... OH NO, SMALL PRIVATE SCHOOLS!!!!
There is/are a lot of grey area here.
It is not ONE (good football school) or the OTHER (good academics).
It is only ONE or the OTHER if you completely shut down one and focus on the other.
There is Stanford with 7000 undergrad students who is not in AS a fertile recruiting area and for a long time was getting 4th/5th tier talent in California. Then they made an excellent hire (Harbaugh) and things changed. They made a second good hire (Shaw) and things continued at that level. Stanford is 47-9 since 2010, they have been to 4 straight BCS games and won 2.
It's funny because even a program like Duke (6500 undergrad) was able to win the Coastal before we ever did.
Then there was Miami, who made 3 poor terrible coaching decisions in a row. Small private schools can have success but they need to make the right coaching decisions. Considering we're 0 for 3 over the last X Years...what do you expect?
As for the past, (local talent) that isn't the sole reason Miami became a Success.
Starts with Coaching...
A. Snelly went on to coach in the Pros (USFL) after Miami
B. JJ went on to coach in the Pros after Miami
C. Erickson went on to coach in the Pros after Miami
D. Butch went on to coach in the Pros after Miami
What you have is 4 for 4 coaches moving on to bigger gigs...PRO GIGS.
Perhaps this coaching thing can overcome a lot.
3. Judging Al after "2 Games."
It isn't 2 games...It is 3 seasons and 2 games. So we have almost 40 games to judge him by at this point.
23-16 (13-12)
What indication will he turn it around at this point? Do you think a guy who is 52% during conference play is going to beat FSU (0-3 during his tenure) and VT (1-2 during his tenure) this season?
(to the board not the poster)
I think many of you just have low expectations at this point. Almost as if we could never have success again. Well it starts with bringing in the right guy. Bring in the wrong guy (Coker, RS and Al) and you will continue this trend.
Last edited:
