FullyERicht
Thunderdome
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
- Messages
- 5,591
Another blah hire.
Same retards defending it.
Yep. They're actually ridiculing the guys who question the hiring of a HS coach who was renowned for winning by recruiting.
In one breath, they squawk "you have no idea if he's going to be great or not" and then in typical contradictory ****** fashion they hit us with "we know he's a major upgrade over Williams." How the fck do they know if he's an upgrade if they're telling us we have no idea how good or bad he'll be?
It's the disease of the new coaching hire. Richt could have brought in Pat Nix as OC, and they'd applaud it.
Hiring a HS corch for a position coach at the U of M was universally recognized as a bad idea 2 weeks ago.
Now? "Great hire" "local ties" "he was a great DB here".
I can understand skepticism, but it's WAAAAY too early for flat-out pessimism.
Our DBs coaches have a grand total of 2 years coaching college ball, none in the P5.
We hired a DC who needs elite coaching at the DB position.
Sounds to me like Diaz got himself a few yes men bc he is afraid of his zone being criticized by his own staff member like he was in Texas when they were getting anally raped every week.