Rumor: Huff to Striker?

Here's an idea: change the scheme and run fits so your athletic run and hit backers can stay clean and play fast. When your DL is flying upfield with no gap integrity that puts a ton of stress on the LBs to diagnose quickly and have the bulk and strength to beat blocks.

South Florida is home to undersized athletic backers yet the Miami scheme requires big intelligent thumpers. It makes no **** sense. We don't know whether Huff is good or not because he's not in a position to succeed. But it's not like the guys in front of him don't consistently look lost IDing plays, take horrible angles, get washed out of plays and lack the speed to make the plays when they're there.
 
Advertisement
Solomon has 6 tackles in 2 seasons at Michigan.
Huff has 5 tackles in 2 seasons at Miami.

What did Manny _iaz see in those two?
 
For the 10 millionth time.

Striker is a HYBRID position, which means, you can put a Safety or LB or (in some cases) a CB at that spot.

A Striker is a just an extra defender that you can leave on the field when you’re in Nickel coverage, as opposed to having to sub in a S in spot of LB or sub in a LB in spot of S, you can have a guy on the field who can do both things.

In the 4-2-5 Defense the Striker replaces the Sam Backer in the 4-3, so instead of having 3 traditional style LB’s (Will, Mike & Sam), you have a Mike, a Will & a HYBRID, although you can replace the Weak side backer with a Hyrbid too if you want.

Huff is a natural Sam Backer, basically the same position that Zach McCloud played his True Freshman year in 2016, but once Manny went more with the 4-2-5 base instead of the 4-3 heavy we were playing in 2016 it changed the dynamic of how they use the LB’s. So now we essentially have had an overcrowded LB room for just 2 LB spots.

Moving Huff to Striker isn’t a bad decision because he can add versatility to a versatile position, meaning he’s not a Rome Finely/Gil Frierson style STK, they were Safety Hybrids, he’s a LB STK which means he can be used in sub-packages as a Blitzer & play more heavy against the run. He’s a big LB that can move, so either drop him coverage against the flats or pin his ears back & let him help the pass rush collapsing the pocket.

He’s an athletic kid that you don’t need to bog down with overly complex reads as a traditional Backer, simplify the game for him & use his athleticism to your advantage.

This is what will make Manny’s job easier, is having kids like Huff, James Williams & Chase Smith etc & finding ways to utilize them, get’em on the field & let them make plays, we have a Defense full of kids who are multipurpose players but they’re not being put in a position to thrive because Manny & Baker (when he was here) wanted to run this hyper complex Zone Defense that made guys 2nd guess & question their every step post snap.

The more athletes you have on Defense the less you have to try to confuse your opponents with Zone Dog Blitzes, Manny’s Defenses are most effective when he can overwhelm the OL with heavy pressure upfront & speed the QB’s processing time getting the offense behind schedule. They’ll either get sacked, be forced to throw an incompletion because they didn’t have enough time to set their feet or make a bad throw that results in a turnover & the easiest way for the Defense to do that is to have as many matchup problems as you can create for the OL & the best way to create matchup nightmares for the OL is to make them have to encode who they’re gonna block when we’re bringing 6-7 man fronts pre snap.
At this point just copy this explanation and keep it the archives..I can’t believe this is still a point of contentious discussion
 
Here's an idea: change the scheme and run fits so your athletic run and hit backers can stay clean and play fast. When your DL is flying upfield with no gap integrity that puts a ton of stress on the LBs to diagnose quickly and have the bulk and strength to beat blocks.

South Florida is home to undersized athletic backers yet the Miami scheme requires big intelligent thumpers. It makes no **** sense. We don't know whether Huff is good or not because he's not in a position to succeed. But it's not like the guys in front of him don't consistently look lost IDing plays, take horrible angles, get washed out of plays and lack the speed to make the plays when they're there.
Sooo play a 3/4 with space eaters and 2 gap up front..I feel like I’ve seen this story play out before...
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Here's an idea: change the scheme and run fits so your athletic run and hit backers can stay clean and play fast. When your DL is flying upfield with no gap integrity that puts a ton of stress on the LBs to diagnose quickly and have the bulk and strength to beat blocks.

South Florida is home to undersized athletic backers yet the Miami scheme requires big intelligent thumpers. It makes no **** sense. We don't know whether Huff is good or not because he's not in a position to succeed. But it's not like the guys in front of him don't consistently look lost IDing plays, take horrible angles, get washed out of plays and lack the speed to make the plays when they're there.

You don't have to recruit undersized LBs if you recruit big to medium Safeties that are too slow to play Safety at the College level but could easily transition to LB...like Thurston Armbrister, but better.

It's the way we used to do things around here, why reinvent the wheel.
 
Advertisement
Nothing against Huff personally but what's the excuse du jour for him not sniffing the field in 2020? First it was his late arrival during camp in 2019. Then it was being ruled academically ineligible. Not strong enough. Maybe the move to striker would benefit him long-term but certain players develop patterns where it's always something. Continuing to hype him up won't matter when Ryan Ragone is ahead of him on the depth chart again in 2021. Pull your heads out of your asses.
 
Nothing against Huff personally but what's the excuse du jour for him not sniffing the field in 2020? First it was his late arrival during camp in 2019. Then it was being ruled academically ineligible. Not strong enough. Maybe the move to striker would benefit him long-term but certain players develop patterns where it's always something. Continuing to hype him up won't matter when Ryan Ragone is ahead of him on the depth chart again in 2021. Pull your heads out of your asses.
Whose hyping him up?? It’s just the fact we have idiots who pulled up stats from 2 RS freshman who we recruited and said they were bad evaluations..AS REDSHIRT FRESHMAN. That’s just dumb as ****. Nobody is a bust after a RS fresh szn anywhere else but Miami
 
Whose hyping him up?? It’s just the fact we have idiots who pulled up stats from 2 RS freshman who we recruited and said they were bad evaluations..AS REDSHIRT FRESHMAN. That’s just dumb as ****. Nobody is a bust after a RS fresh szn anywhere else but Miami

him trying out striker seems like a natural fit for him given his measurables. would also put him in a spot where he can succeed. we only play 2 LBs at once anyways and he doesn't fit either role there.
 
Advertisement
him trying out striker seems like a natural fit for him given his measurables. would also put him in a spot where he can succeed. we only play 2 LBs at once anyways and he doesn't fit either role there.
It also maybe a product of what they see in the other guys. If they feel Brooks, Flagg, Tac have taking a jump at ILB then yes move Huff to a position where he use his length and athleticism
 
Nothing against Huff personally but what's the excuse du jour for him not sniffing the field in 2020? First it was his late arrival during camp in 2019. Then it was being ruled academically ineligible. Not strong enough. Maybe the move to striker would benefit him long-term but certain players develop patterns where it's always something. Continuing to hype him up won't matter when Ryan Ragone is ahead of him on the depth chart again in 2021. Pull your heads out of your asses.
He played the same amount as TAC (is he a bust as a true freshman?). Dont know why Ragone plays so much but he does im guessing seniority or favortism.
He's an OLB and we play one short at that spot since we have "striker".
 
Sooo play a 3/4 with space eaters and 2 gap up front..I feel like I’ve seen this story play out before...
That's not what he is saying at all. Not every aggressive 4-3 4-2-5 defense has the almost blatant disregard for gap integrity that we do. There are plenty of aggressive college defenses that place a very high value on gap integrity. Just because the guy proposes a defensive change that prioritizes gap integrity and discipline in setting the edge etc doesn't mean he is advocating a move to a 3-4 2 gap read and react Golden/Donofrio style defense.
 
Advertisement
That's not what he is saying at all. Not every aggressive 4-3 4-2-5 defense has the almost blatant disregard for gap integrity that we do. There are plenty of aggressive college defenses that place a very high value on gap integrity. Just because the guy proposes a defensive change that prioritizes gap integrity and discipline in setting the edge etc doesn't mean he is advocating a move to a 3-4 2 gap read and react Golden/Donofrio style defense.
That’s what he is saying tho. He literally said change the scheme and run fits so our LBs could stay clean..that means 2 gap space eaters up front.. Our Dline is taught to get they toes and *** across the LOS and shoot gaps..aside from the NT who has a 2 gap responsibility (in certain fronts). Everyone else is taught to shoot through..if that’s the case it’s up to the Middle backers to see it quick and get they *** were they need to be QUICk. That’s were the drop off was with shaq and pink this past year and it showed up in the difference in TFL production from the LBs. That’s instincts.

as far as setting the edge, depends on the call. If the DE is shooting the B (which we do a lot of under Manny) on a particular play then it might the SS or even the CBS responsibility to set a hard edge and be physical so the interior pursuit can flow out. From our tv screens it’s hard to 1st guess everyone’s responsibility on a given call unless your replaying every play. That said bottomline is we have to be better for sure
 
That’s what he is saying tho. He literally said change the scheme and run fits so our LBs could stay clean..that means 2 gap space eaters up front.. Our Dline is taught to get they toes and *** across the LOS and shoot gaps..aside from the NT who has a 2 gap responsibility (in certain fronts). Everyone else is taught to shoot through..if that’s the case it’s up to the Middle backers to see it quick and get they *** were they need to be QUICk. That’s were the drop off was with shaq and pink this past year and it showed up in the difference in TFL production from the LBs. That’s instincts.

as far as setting the edge, depends on the call. If the DE is shooting the B (which we do a lot of under Manny) on a particular play then it might the SS or even the CBS responsibility to set a hard edge and be physical so the interior pursuit can flow out. From our tv screens it’s hard to 1st guess everyone’s responsibility on a given call unless your replaying every play. That said bottomline is we have to be better for sure

C’mon bro, you know better than this.

We do two things that put our linebackers in no man’s land: 1. Rush our ends way up field. 2. Predictable stunting.

You don’t have to two gap to protect your linebackers. You penetrate and control your assigned gap with body position and hand usage. We were always taught on run downs to reestablish the line of scrimmage a yard into the backfield, then find the ball. Running your self past the running back on 1st and 2nd down was a big no-no.

Shooting gaps at DT is usually ok because it causes instant disruption, but he has to make the play on the ball carrier. Teams haven’t really blown us off the the ball running up the middle lately. It’s at the edge where we get gouged. If we can’t whip a team athletically, they know where to run the ball and hurt us.

Manny’s system puts a premium on instincts, but he has done a poor job recruiting high instinct players, at least upper classman wiSe

It doesn’t help we haven’t had a 1tech who can command and beat a double team in a while.

A more conventional and disciplined gap system would allow our guys to play faster post snap with much less guessing. Maybe it’s just Huff and Jennings having problems. Pinckney took the Will as a true freshman and never looked back, but they simplified the linebacker assignments to give those guys confidence. IT WORKED. Maybe that is what is needed now.
 
Watch the 2017 ND game. The defense shut down Josh Adams and the ND power-run game running the same type of schemes that UNC ran against us, with better linemen and a mobile QB. Norton ate up space in the middle, 99 could set an edge and fight pressure, and the LBs were able to shoot gaps and force backs to hesitate behind the line. That defense gave up 3.5ypc and 10 total rushing TDs on the year.

The Bucs just won a Super Bowl with an aggressive penetrating 3-4 base scheme. Your front alignment doesn't have to prohibit you from attacking the backfield. The Bucs shut down power schemes with backside pursuit but the frontside linemen stay in their gaps and fight pressure. You need the right personnel to do this and you have to coach it. Miami recruits too many selfish run-around guys and calls too many stunts on early downs. So even if the backside pursuit is on time the frontside is so open that backs are already off to the races.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top