- Joined
- Dec 28, 2016
- Messages
- 12,391
Defamation is iffy. Challenging the determination of a booster appears to be an uphill battle considering how broad that definition is. Arguably, I am a booster under the phrase of “participating in an athletics program” by virtue of being a season ticket holder. That definition is awfully broad. Also, there is likely a decent argument that anything said about Ruiz falls under an absolute or qualified litigation privilege.
I dunno. He certainly loves to stir it up!
Scroll back up to your other post I responded to for my thoughts on this. In short, that defense may be more trouble than it's worth for the NCAA. It also seems to open the door into broad discovery into action taken (and more importantly, not taken) by the NCAA in dealings involving all these other (arguably all of us) boosters.