So you are going to tell be that the Big 12 is 10 pts better than the ACC using that guy's metrics? Bull****. Take TCU out of the equation even Kansas State and they were no better than the ACC. The Big 12 is only 2 points under the SEC? What a joke! Georgia beat TCU like it was playing Austin Peay. And Alabama embarrassed the Big 12 champs.
Find any other metrics that disagree, and we can talk about it. I’m willing to bet you can’t.
You’re not looking at things as a whole. This is the entire league. Not the top. The reason the ACC is so bad is UVA, VT, BC, and GT were literally 4 of the very worst P5 teams in the whole country. That’s over a quarter of your league.
The Big 12 was miles better than the ACC as well. First of all, your argument is nonsense. “Take out TCU and K-State”. Huh? They’re in the league. You’re the guy who says, sure, our running back had 240 yards rushing, but take out those two 80-yard runs and what did he do? Ummmm, those count.
TCU, Texas, K-State, OU, Oklahoma State, and Baylor were probably all Top 50 teams. The last 3 weren’t great, but they’re better than Syracuse, Miami, NC State, etc.
Top to bottom, the Big 12 was a much better league. Stop the nonsense. The ACC sucks balls. Miami, UVA, VT, GT, and BC had to be 5 of the worst 10 power 5 teams in the country. Who were worse than those 5? Colorado, Stanford, Northwestern, maybe Rutgers. Iowa State? All 5 of those ACC teams were worse than anyone in the SEC. The league is hot garbage.
I added Jeff Sagarin’s ratings too for context. He’s only been doing this for like 40 years. See the pic. ACC coastal is the worst P5 division, as usual. And as a group is worse than the AAC lmao.