Richt doesn't want pressure

LOL richt has been more successful here than any coach in the last 15 years.

Woohoo, we won 10 games last year and got embarrassed by every team with a pulse since then. When did this crap become the standard at Miami. It's just not good enough and every legitimate Cane fan should be demanding better.
 
Advertisement
He clearly wrote that he was joking on the last part.

You have a concussion.

Believe it is you who is concussed, he clearly wrote that he was joking about ringing doorbells, read it slowly and journey might comprehend.
 
I wouldn't be shocked to see Richt change up everything offensively. Leading up to BC. I'm actually feeling a 2016 revamp. Where he went on to cater to Kaaya.

This will really grind peoples gear for sure and have them wondering. Why did you wait for the wheels to come off too make the changes needed. Once the season is over. He will go back to trying to fit square pegs into round holes. Unless he finds a 11 players that can pull off what he really wants.

Na, he ain't changing ****. Just listen to his interview with Rose. "His plays have been working for 30 years and in practice. All 11 guys just need to execute". He's going to roll out the same ****show he's been rolling out all season.
 
The AD is supposed to keep the HC accountable. While I’m not one of the anti Blake porsters, I just don’t see him confronting Recht about his O.

The furthest Blake gets to confronting Richt would be asking him how he likes his eggs done and if he likes his toast buttered when serving him breakfast in the morning.
 
The furthest Blake gets to confronting Richt would be asking him how he likes his eggs done and if he likes his toast buttered when serving him breakfast in the morning.
I happen to think Blake has done good things here, and I still can’t argue w your point.
 
We called plays that we practiced all week, I know that. We called plays that we had faith in. We called plays that we thought we give us the best chance in all situations. We called plays where we took shots. We called plays just trying to run the ball — we had inside zone, outside zone, we ran counter.

We ran things we thought would succeed and they didn’t. And why they didn’t succeed, we’ll see. Most of the time when you look at the tape it’s a matter of somebody or a couple of guys not getting their job done, normally.

Are there some plays that we could call that would give us a better chance? I’m certain of that, but we call plays that we worked hard on, believed in and have had success over the last 30 years, so I feel pretty good about them going in.

EPIC , spot on @CaneDynasty , in an earlier post I mentioned about these plays practiced and you would have thought that many here never heard of such a thing.

Any way every single play in every single play book from little league up to the NFL is designed to score every single time guaranteed IF and this is huge IF almost as big as my desk IF.

The only thing that keeps the play from not scoring every single time is human error , players are flat,player is a hair slower , misses a block and what ever the player messes up in accomplishing the play being called.

Again human error is the only thing that makes a play not succeed.

GOCANES
 
I truly don’t understand the people still pushing back the anti Richt train. Dude is a bad on the field coach who feasts largely on terrible teams and lays a few stinkers a year.
We were a few plays from 5-6 losses last year. More talent than a golden team but same lost look on the field.
If you accept mediocrity that’s all your eyes going to get
 
EPIC , spot on @CaneDynasty , in an earlier post I mentioned about these plays practiced and you would have thought that many here never heard of such a thing.

Any way every single play in every single play book from little league up to the NFL is designed to score every single time guaranteed IF and this is huge IF almost as big as my desk IF.

The only thing that keeps the play from not scoring every single time is human error , players are flat,player is a hair slower , misses a block and what ever the player messes up in accomplishing the play being called.

Again human error is the only thing that makes a play not succeed.

GOCANES

That was a mork rich quote. Word for word.
 
Advertisement
Any way every single play in every single play book from little league up to the NFL is designed to score every single time.....
The only thing that keeps the play from not scoring every single time is human error.....

This is the dumbest thing I've ever seen. A 5 yard out pattern on 3rd and 3 isn't designed to score. A handoff to the fullback on 3rd and inches isn't designed to score. Good lord. Plays are designed for specific downs and distances.
 
whether this is true or not, BC is a crossroads game for him, another stinker and he will come home to 25-30K and banners, he aint ever seen anything like it

Well see, this isn't going to happen, because Rosier, in his post-game interview said so, as he chalked up this loss to UVA having 2 weeks to prepare, and when teams are in this situation, they always come out firing. So, according to Rosier, we should be well-prepared for BC.

And it's my guess all hellfire shall be unleashed if we are not.
 
This is the dumbest thing I've ever seen. A 5 yard out pattern on 3rd and 3 isn't designed to score. A handoff to the fullback on 3rd and inches isn't designed to score. Good lord. Plays are designed for specific downs and distances.

Sorry your totally wrong here, they are ALL designed to score....PERIOD.

GOCANES
 
Advertisement
I truly believe that Mark Richt wants to win here at UM. He just doesn't have the tools or internal fortitude to get it done. Or he's just too stubborn to change.
 
A 2010 article by a UGA writer someone linked on here earlier https://bleacherreport.com/articles/469429. Highlights:

-Inconsistent and underachieving offenses have persisted during Richt's tenure.
-At no point, not even during the 2002-2007 heyday when UGA was in the top 10 every season and won two SEC titles and two BCS bowl games, was it due to having some explosive offense.
-The idea that Richt was ever this great play-caller/strategist at his days at FSU is fiction, people. First Richt wasn't running the FSU offense during their best years, Bobby Bowden and other coordinators like former South Carolina head coach Brad Scott were.
-When Richt got the FSU offensive coordinator job, he didn't do anything especially groundbreaking or innovative at FSU. By then, FSU was already a powerhouse well into their record-breaking string of consecutive top 5 finishes. FSU's offensive success during a great deal of that era was mostly due to the fact that back then (the 80s and early 90s) they were the only big time southern program relying on the passing game.
-So, rather than Richt's being this great coach, it was often just the result of playing a different style than everybody was used to seeing and defending, and also having four and five star players at every position on offense competing against two and three star ACC recruits on defense.
-It's easy to look like a genius when people aren't scheming to stop you, and even easier when you have better players than everybody else. But by the time Richt got to UGA, everybody in the SEC had caught onto defending the passing game, because by then Steve Spurrier, Peyton Manning, Tim Couch, Hal Mumme etc. had been through the conference.
-Bottom line: Richt is basically relying on what he learned at Miami (where he was a player and coach) and FSU (where he was a coach) in the 1980s and 1990s at UGA
-The problem is what worked for Miami and FSU in the 1980s and 1990s is not going to work in the current SEC whether Richt or Bobo is calling the plays.
-Add that to the fact that it was Richt's decision to waste both last season and this season by starting Joe Cox instead of playing Aaron Murray.
Had Richt played the much more physically gifted Murray over the over-hyped recruit...UGA has about the same season last year as they wound up having anyway. The difference is that with a year of experience under his belt, Murray would have been a much better QB this season
-Not saying that Richt is a bad coach who needs to be fired. You can't accomplish what Richt did in the SEC from 2001-2007 by being a bad coach. Richt is a proven winner, and firing him always carries the risk of getting someone who isn't. Plenty of schools have fired a good coach looking for someone better and wound up with someone—indeed a string of people—much worse.
-Instead, Richt needs to hire a coordinator who can win without A) the gigantic talent advantage that Miami had over the Big East and FSU had over the ACC and B) in an SEC where polished QBs, WRs and pass-blocking offensive linemen are rare.
-Bottom line UGA fans: Richt is the real problem. It is time to apply pressure to make Richt solve it.

It's Groundhog Day, except we caught on quicker. Why wouldn't he want to do it differently the second time around after getting fired for underperforming the first time? Old habits die hard, I guess, especially when they're making you millions without winning titles.
 
Last edited:
I truly believe that Mark Richt wants to win here at UM. He just doesn't have the tools or internal fortitude to get it done. Or he's just too stubborn to change.
imo, he doesn't have the QB that he wants to pull it off. Perhaps he does with Jarren but that remains to be seen.

He tried to force Kaaya into what he wanted but it didn't pan out. So in that instance he changed up to fit what his QB was good at. I feel that is why Kaaya left. Richt didn't want to have to change what he wanted to do as OC, but he didn't want to fall on his face his 1st season either.

We got lucky last season with Malik. Richt ran his system and we were able to win in spite of the QB. If it went bad early on. He could've played the QB card. Finally it did go bad but he had a 15 game win streak to play with.

This season is just what last season could've very easily looked like. The difference in the two season. Is we haven't had the same luck on offense we did a year ago.
 
Back
Top