RECEIPTS - Cam Ward/Mario

Advertisement
@Cribby - I am sure you have this one in your pocket

@Turnovachain

View attachment 278854



Frustrated World Cup GIF
 
This thread is like being in middle or high school. I'm going to pull "receipts", blah, blah, blah. Grow the **** up. Cam, himself, said he was going to the NFL draft, but, hey, why believe the kid, right? Mario was relentless and pulled a shocker, which why I'm grateful for, but I hope this doesn't become the norm with QBs or we're screwed. Let's hope he learns some serious gameday coaching skills before August and we'll finally have a contending team. Peace out
 
This thread is like being in middle or high school. I'm going to pull "receipts", blah, blah, blah. Grow the **** up. Cam, himself, said he was going to the NFL draft, but, hey, why believe the kid, right? Mario was relentless and pulled a shocker, which why I'm grateful for, but I hope this doesn't become the norm with QBs or we're screwed. Let's hope he learns some serious gameday coaching skills before August and we'll finally have a contending team. Peace out
IMG_2469.gif
 
Advertisement
@rsa coral gables - the Slurpers consider takes like this to be real mopey.

I don’t and most here don’t but just putting this the example for all other rational takes. Not making fun of you.

View attachment 278863

my earlier post was not mopey. on a scale of 1 to 1000, it was -10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.

the point of that post was that miami needed to be in contact with other options, when in fact they were in contact with other options. not sure what the "receipt" proves. respectfully
 
my earlier post was not mopey. on a scale of 1 to 1000, it was -10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.

the point of that post was that miami needed to be in contact with other options, when in fact they were in contact with other options. not sure what the "receipt" proves. respectfully
It wasn’t a receipt against you. I was very clear in what I said and why I posted it:

Rational take that some people would consider a mopey take when it’s not and that it would be the example covering all other similar takes in case the mopes has any ideas.
 
Advertisement
It wasn’t a receipt against you. I was very clear in what I said and why I posted it:

Rational take that some people would consider a mopey take when it’s not and that it would be the example covering all other similar takes in case the mopes has any ideas.
got it. so i'm not mopey in your eyes, correct?
 
Back
Top