forums

Rashada is suing Napier and a Florida booster.

Advertisement
the storm said:
Huge story about this in the Wall SJ. Rashada must be dumb as a box of rocks if he actually thought someone was going to cough up $14M for him. There’s one born every minute. :zczkqmritjdsoaq.jpg:
Click to expand...

.... he really must be dumb signing with Arizona State after things crapped out with Miami and then Florida as the Sun Devils notoriously have struggled with NIL money and had zero shot every paying the kid that kind of loot.

Whatever he agreed to in Tempe at his dad's alma mater; lots of smoke about how he got burned out there and ASU virtually delivered on none of their promises—but no point in suing those broke fools; go after Florida and that bogus $14-million offer as the reneging on that deal is what send the kid spiraling in the first place, as Miami didn't want him after that and Arizona State was all that was left.... before leaving for Georgia to be a back-up.
 
Rashada, Cormani, whoever..this is why I never trip when recruits don’t workout. It always works itself out in the end. Not the end of the world for us, just the end of the line in their recruitment with us. Hope it goes well for them.
 
Bender said:
B


View attachment 290033
Click to expand...

Burn It To The Ground GIF by Parker McCollum
 
88 said:
Might end up benefiting Florida if they can fire Napier with cause.
Click to expand...
It might in the short term. Do you think Billy would be able to parlay his success at UF into another job? Or do you think he would be fired "for cause" scapegoated, unable to find work and pull a Coach Kul and drag UF under the bus, then sue UF saying UF knew about it, encouraged it, **** even forced him to do it and thus he should still get his buyout $$$.

My guess is if they elect to go that route Billy and UF have a mutual "parting of ways" with a settlement sum that is significant but significantly lower than what he would have received.
 
Advertisement
Yo if high school qbs getting this kinda money . What actually are the porta qbs getting ?!?!? No way rwe offered rashada 9.5 mill and then only got cam ward for like 800k 🤣
 
Can't wait until a maniac like Rusty Hardin gets to go after this clown.

It was the Botox talking!!! I had accidentally inhaled a significant amount of spray tan! Look at me! I could've never legitimately offered this kid THAT amount of money as my brain has been severely injured by a clinic in Turkey that does hair plugs using only a nail gun and the manes of euthanized race horses!

Screenshot_20240521_130537_Google.jpg
 
ARodri7982 said:
This was the exact thing I was going to write. That might be the silver lining for them in all of this. Interesting.
Click to expand...
This is where my heads at. Reeks of an excuse to fire for cause ans avoid a buyout. Then they settle for 1m with Rashada and be done. This will never make it to court.
 
ARodri7982 said:
This was the exact thing I was going to write. That might be the silver lining for them in all of this. Interesting.
Click to expand...
Not that we're standing on high ground on this front but there isn't reallllly a potential silver lining here for the ol' Gaytes. They've proven to be as inept as they are underwhelming when it comes to hiring new coaches and this cloud/stain is something you absolutely do not want in the NIL era.
 
Advertisement
Caneau said:
The contract shows his signature but not the Gator Collective. Hopefully that is a mistake on which copy was attached to the suit.
Click to expand...
Maybe that is how they (UF) got out of it? I dont see any contract attached to the complaint and found it odd they are not suing for breach of contract. If they were suing for breach they needed to attach the contract that was breached but that aint happening here. It is all fraud and tortious interference stuff.

Edit: Rashada also elected not to sue UF or any of the collectives. Instead it is Napier, Hugh, the (former) director of personnel guy and Hugh's auto company.

Also LOL at Rashada and his counsel advising him that agreement was okay to sign... it is only a 3 page contract and the 3rd page is only the signature page, for termination in section 5 it gives the collective the sole and absolute right to terminate if they feel the agreement violates rules MADE BY UF that could possibly cause a legal or REPUTATIONAL risk of the collective, in the collective's sole discretion.

So basically Rashada could have signed this, UF passes some BS policy that addresses one provision in the agreement and the collective could come to the conclusion that violating that BS policy would hurt the collective's sterling reputation and pull out of the deal with no repercussions.
 
Last edited:
Cookie917 said:
Maybe that is how they (UF) got out of it? I dont see any contract attached to the complaint and found it odd they are not suing for breach of contract. If they were suing for breach they needed to attach the contract that was breached but that aint happening here. It is all fraud and tortious interference stuff.

Edit: Rashada also elected not to sue UF or any of the collectives. Instead it is Napier, Hugh, the (former) director of personnel guy and Hugh's auto company.

Also LOL at Rashada and his counsel advising him that agreement was okay to sign... it is only a 3 page contract and the 3rd page is only the signature page, for termination in section 5 it gives the collective the sole and absolute right to terminate if they feel the agreement violates rules MADE BY UF that could possibly cause a legal or REPUTATIONAL risk of the collective, in the collective's sole discretion.

So basically Rashada could have signed this, UF passes some BS policy that addresses one provision in the agreement and the collective could come to the conclusion that violating that BS policy would hurt the collective's sterling reputation and pull out of the deal with no repercussions.
Click to expand...

Tweet by Andy Staples
 

Attachments

Back
Top