Mackmiller974
All ACC
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2017
- Messages
- 8,075
Just entered the portal and is a grad transfer.
137 Tackles 39.5 TFL and 26.5 Sacks in 3 years at Temple
137 Tackles 39.5 TFL and 26.5 Sacks in 3 years at Temple
Just entered the portal and is a grad transfer.
137 Tackles 39.5 TFL and 26.5 Sacks in 3 years at Temple
Harvey, Roussea, Phillips, Patchan, besides the 2 freshamn Williams, am I'm missing anybody? With Phillips, Patchan and Rpusseas there is really no need for him.
Harvey is young and hasn't shown anything yet. Phillips needs to show he can stay healthy and hasn't played in over a year. Patchan is a nice backup player and run stuffer.
When a kid like Roche comes in the portal, you jump. He's good. We rotate 4 DEs all the time, so there's plenty of room for him with Hill/Garvin out and Height not coming in.
DPOY in the AAC.
Harvey is young and hasn't shown anything yet. Phillips needs to show he can stay healthy and hasn't played in over a year. Patchan is a nice backup player and run stuffer.
When a kid like Roche comes in the portal, you jump. He's good. We rotate 4 DEs all the time, so there's plenty of room for him with Hill/Garvin out and Height not coming in.
I'm all for bringing him in if there is space, but I don't want him taking a spot from like a OL or CB. With that being said I still believe that UM needs to bring in 1 more DE with the departure of Hill and Garvin, I would it rather be a high school prospects rather than a grad transferHarvey is young and hasn't shown anything yet. Phillips needs to show he can stay healthy and hasn't played in over a year. Patchan is a nice backup player and run stuffer.
When a kid like Roche comes in the portal, you jump. He's good. We rotate 4 DEs all the time, so there's plenty of room for him with Hill/Garvin out and Height not coming in.
Harvey, GR, Phillips, Patchan, Chantz, Cam, Quentin... I would bring him in only thing it can do is make guys want to ball moreHarvey, Roussea, Phillips, Patchan, besides the 2 freshamn Williams, am I'm missing anybody? With Phillips, Patchan and Rpusseas there is really no need for him.
I'm all for bringing him in if there is space, but I don't want him taking a spot from like a OL or CB. With that being said I still believe that UM needs to bring in 1 more DE with the departure of Hill and Garvin, I would it rather be a high school prospects rather than a grad transfer
My only worry is G5 Dlinemen didnt fair well this year transferring up to the P5.
With Nesta, Miller, and Rousseau/Phillips/Harvey along side him, he would be fine here. We don’t exactly play powerhouse O lines on a weekly basis.
Especially if we play against uptempo offenses.Exactly.
He could help make up for the two losses of garvin and hill. Veteran talent on dl is a good thing.
Im a big Harvey guy but he was way over his head in the bowl . He might need a little more work and strength.