Protect College Sports Act [formerly “SCORE Act” thread]

That was a very unsettling article. Tobacco Road wants to imprison Miami, FSU, and Clemson. Hiring Richard Burr to lobby for the ACC without full support of all member schools says a lot. Only thing that surprises me is I would have presumed UNC to vehemently oppose any provision that would restrict its ability to move.
I'm not sure what to believe, so much info from so many sources. These two articles highlight UNC as one of the schools most opposed to the movement restrictions.



UNC appears to oppose section 205 directly while broadly supporting the PCSA.
 
That was a very unsettling article. Tobacco Road wants to imprison Miami, FSU, and Clemson. Hiring Richard Burr to lobby for the ACC without full support of all member schools says a lot. Only thing that surprises me is I would have presumed UNC to vehemently oppose any provision that would restrict its ability to move.
I'm not sure what to believe, so much info from so many sources. These two articles highlight UNC as one of the schools most opposed to the movement restrictions.



UNC appears to oppose section 205 directly while broadly supporting the PCSA.
I heard UNC wanted out too.
 
I'm not sure what to believe, so much info from so many sources. These two articles highlight UNC as one of the schools most opposed to the movement restrictions.



UNC appears to oppose section 205 directly while broadly supporting the PCSA.
That article suggested that the ACC Commissioner hired DLA Piper (as did UNC), which actively lobbied Congress up through June or July, and at no point did they expressly oppose 205 or propose, on behalf of the ACC, alternative language (which Cruz’s people apparently solicited). I could be reading more into it than I should, but really strange that UNC hasn’t been more vocal.
 
I'm not sure what to believe, so much info from so many sources. These two articles highlight UNC as one of the schools most opposed to the movement restrictions.



UNC appears to oppose section 205 directly while broadly supporting the PCSA.
Ross is correct here. But not everything he has is right i.e. he wrote Miami sued the ACC w/ FSU.

UNC wants out because they are the SEC’s #1 choice before any other school in America. The B1G is interested in them; & They were also one of the 3 schools (Clemson + FSU) who voted against adding Berkeley, Stanford, and SMU.

The thing that ****es me off it was their ****** commissioner and his nepo baby son who caused all these revenue problems
 
That article suggested that the ACC Commissioner hired DLA Piper (as did UNC), which actively lobbied Congress up through June or July, and at no point did they expressly oppose 205 or propose, on behalf of the ACC, alternative language (which Cruz’s people apparently solicited). I could be reading more into it than I should, but really strange that UNC hasn’t been more vocal.
I made a public records request with UNC so we will find out. :)
 
Back
Top