Predict Rosier's stats

Assuming Malik starts all 12 regular season games, what type of stat line do you think he'll put up?

I'm thinking like 2250 yards, 58% completion, 18/13 td/int, 750 yards rushing 7 TDs.

He wouldn't have the chance to put up those horrific numbers. He'd get benched before he did that.

Dude hangs 70% completion percentage on the best D he'll face all year (ours), and you underachievers have him putting up **** numbers like this against the likes of BCC, Ark State, et. al.?

He should be applauded for his scrimmage performance, but 70% completion in a controlled scrimmage setting (ball placed at certain spots on the field, etc), while not taking full hits is very different than in real game action. Still, it was impressive.

Keep dry hating on Malik, bro. I see you.

Completing anything against UM in ANY situation is more impressive than what he'll be facing most of the season.

It turned out that completing 70% against our basura secondary, especially in a controlled scrimmage setting, isn't that impressive.
 
Advertisement
Final stats:

54%, 3,120 yards, 26 TDs/14 INTs

468 rushing yards, 5 TDs

Crazy that in his last four games (UVA, Pitt, Clemson, Wisconsin) he had 7 INTs (to only 6 TDs) and threw for well under 50% completion. Completely fell apart at the end of the season. Injured or not, he went from having a QBR of 91.0 in the Notre Dame win to being one of the primary reasons we closed out the season 1-3.
 
Final stats:

54%, 3,120 yards, 26 TDs/14 INTs

468 rushing yards, 5 TDs

Crazy that in his last four games (UVA, Pitt, Clemson, Wisconsin) he had 7 INTs (to only 6 TDs) and threw for well under 50% completion. Completely fell apart at the end of the season. Injured or not, he went from having a QBR of 91.0 in the Notre Dame win to being one of the primary reasons we closed out the season 1-3.

So he ended with less than a 2 to 1 ratio... and will be losing his job this spring.
 
I see him having a better than 2 to 1 TD to INT ratio. If he doesn't he might not be the starter all year. 25 TDs, 10 INTs, and several drives kept alive with his feet.

Who the heck thought this would be so close to the truth and understated at that. Good call.
 
Final stats:

54%, 3,120 yards, 26 TDs/14 INTs

468 rushing yards, 5 TDs

Crazy that in his last four games (UVA, Pitt, Clemson, Wisconsin) he had 7 INTs (to only 6 TDs) and threw for well under 50% completion. Completely fell apart at the end of the season. Injured or not, he went from having a QBR of 91.0 in the Notre Dame win to being one of the primary reasons we closed out the season 1-3.

Maybe the jig was up? Seemed like Pitt, Clem and Wisky wisened up a lot, and devoted their game plan to Letting Rosier win the game for them.
 
Advertisement
Definitely performed better than what we all thought.

Not good enough to be where we want to be though, he will have to really improve to beat out Perry if the hype is real
 
Final stats:

54%, 3,120 yards, 26 TDs/14 INTs

468 rushing yards, 5 TDs

Crazy that in his last four games (UVA, Pitt, Clemson, Wisconsin) he had 7 INTs (to only 6 TDs) and threw for well under 50% completion. Completely fell apart at the end of the season. Injured or not, he went from having a QBR of 91.0 in the Notre Dame win to being one of the primary reasons we closed out the season 1-3.

To be fair, most thought that how his stats would look off rip.
 
Advertisement
Definitely performed better than what we all thought.

Not good enough to be where we want to be though, he will have to really improve to beat out Perry if the hype is real

Did you see the predictions? He did not perform better than we all thought. OP predicted 58% passing and was rebuked by [MENTION=4841]The Franchise[/MENTION] for predicting so low of a percentage.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Back
Top