I said I just heard, I have no idea if it's true or not. So I'm not fighting you, this isn't my area of expertise. But you're saying this doesn't exist?
www.ncaa.org
I'm not arguing with you either. And I'm not saying that ineligibility based on academics does not exist.
I'm saying a couple of things that are different. First, there should be no "rumors" or any other uncertainty as to Huff's eligibility. The NCAA first-year eligibility rule is based on a high school player having completed a certain number of core courses/GPA by the beginning of his senior year in high school. The rule is designed to address situations where a kid could flunk HS for 3 years, while miraculously taking a ton of correspondence courses as a senior, and then he would be eligible for admission and immediate playing time as a freshman.
By the rules, Miami would have known if Huff is eligible to play as a freshman...a year ago. There should be no rumors or uncertainty, as his eligibility to play as a freshman would have been locked in prior to his senior year. If, given our LB situation (and the fact that we started 3 freshmen a few years ago), we took Huff knowing that he would not be able to play as a freshman, then I would seriously question the decision-making of our coaches and their recruiting decisions. If Huff has to sit out for a year, then we ABSOLUTELY should have signed a JuCo or transfer LB who was eligible to play in 2019.
And as for the terminology, to call it "academic redshirt" is a misnomer. The term "redshirt" indicates a decision by a university to erase a season in which a player was eligible to play, and for which a player is allowed to have played in up to 4 games. The "regular" redshirt allows a player to play in 4 games, and if a team is forced to use a player for more than 4 games, the redshirt is no longer an option. A medical redshirt also allows a player to participate in up to 4 games prior to the injury.
No matter what anyone calls it, "academic redshirting" is not actual redshirting. As someone has pointed out, it is like Prop 48, when a freshman was completely ineligible to play for one year. There is no choice for the university to make under the new rule, as the recruit should already know his freshman eligibility status by the end of his junior year of high school.
It is possible that Huff is ineligible to play in 2019, but all of our coaches should have known his status in 2018. If Huff is ineligible, it is outside of Miami's control, we don't have a choice of whether to redshirt him or "burn" his redshirt. I won't comment too much on what reporters have written about Huff previously, but I have seen indications that he was in line for playing time as a freshman.
Given our known injury situations, our certainty that Shaq/Pinck/McCloud are all done after this year, Jennings' brush with injury recently, and our minimal number of LB signees since Shaq/Pinck/McCloud, it seems bizarre that Manny would sign Huff knowing he could not play in 2019, and then do nothing else to address the 2019 LB issue in the Portal, when we signed 8 guys out of the Portal.