forums

Practice #11

Advertisement
D RevLee said:
You can keep ignoring that being a leader on and off the field is important or knowing the playbook is important but if they can't do that, they won't play.

Tate is accurate enough or he wouldn't have been rated a 5 star for most of his recruitment, wouldnt have received a scholarship from one of the best head coaches of all time, or wouldnt have went 10/10 against Rutgers and 23/28 as a whole. Sounds

Cam, Baker, Johnny. All 3 Heisman winners. All 3 were not the most accurate but their ability to extend plays made windows open up more.
Click to expand...
And what makes u think Tate is this outstanding leader and is just going to understand the playbook better than Kosi or Jarren? Is it because he was on a stack team in high school and won championships, because that don't mean **** once u get in college. Because if he did have these outstanding qualities u talk of I guarantee that he would not be at Miami rn and instead practicing being the starter for OU. That being said, I do not doubt his competitive and hope the best man wins.
 
twes.305 said:
Ur saying he is bias becuase he is only seeing 50%, that's stupid. U r only allowed to give a good opinion on the things you have seen, it does not matter if he has seen 50% or 100%, u base ur opinion on what has been seen.
Click to expand...

That's not I'm saying but sounds good huh?

He said Tate's not going out without a fight like he's losing the job already. The depth chart came out and I didn't see Tate listed as 1st, 2nd, or 3rd string. I saw 1A, 1B, 1C. Can't allude to someone losing when all u have seen is a controlled setting. That's like seeing the combine and saying the guy with the best numbers is the best player.
 
D RevLee said:
That's not I'm saying but sounds good huh?

He said Tate's not going out without a fight like he's losing the job already. The depth chart came out and I didn't see Tate listed as 1st, 2nd, or 3rd string. I saw 1A, 1B, 1C. Can't allude to someone losing when all u have seen is a controlled setting. That's like seeing the combine and saying the guy with the best numbers is the best player.
Click to expand...
In his opinion he thinks Tate is a little behind, especially in the accuracy department and he is sharing what he thinks. That's really not bias at all.
 
D RevLee said:
You can keep ignoring that being a leader on and off the field is important or knowing the playbook is important but if they can't do that, they won't play.

Tate is accurate enough or he wouldn't have been rated a 5 star for most of his recruitment, wouldnt have received a scholarship from one of the best head coaches of all time, or wouldnt have went 10/10 against Rutgers and 23/28 as a whole. Sounds

Cam, Baker, Johnny. All 3 Heisman winners. All 3 were not the most accurate but their ability to extend plays made windows open up more.
Click to expand...

Rutgers has the worst football program in the entire country. And Tate was a 4-star through 247 at the end of the cycle. You're too caught up in Martell rather then letting the best QB come out of camp whether that be Martell, Perry or Williams.
 
Advertisement
D RevLee said:
I think Tate wins the job and will tell u I'm bias. He's losing credibility with me acting like he is unbiased but continually making backhanded compliments like this one. They're seeing 90% of Kosi/Jarrens games and 50% of Tates. I can't wait for the team to go live so people like this can get exposed.
Click to expand...
i've seen this before - these sneaky techniques to divide the fan base and create controversy. fans are going to be shocked when tate gets the job because guys like footballville and other posters on this board make it seem like he is stinking up the joint.
 
TVTLCanes said:
If Tate was so great Ohio State would've fought to keep him. Perry and Williams is my pick to win the QB job, We haven't seen Perry or Williams 100% not what QB coach we had last year, plus Tate is on the same level as the rest of the QB...50%
Click to expand...
how do you know what they did to keep him? they knew he wasn't getting a fair shot to start - maybe they weren't going to lie to him to keep him.
 
twes.305 said:
In his opinion he thinks Tate is a little behind, especially in the accuracy department and he is sharing what he thinks. That's really not bias at all.
Click to expand...
he took it to another level implying that it was fact that tate was losing the race. obviously he doesn't know anything or he isn't anyone important. just pointing out that his post was silly and i called him out for it.
 
orange&green84 said:
Rutgers has the worst football program in the entire country. And Tate was a 4-star through 247 at the end of the cycle. You're too caught up in Martell rather then letting the best QB come out of camp whether that be Martell, Perry or Williams.
Click to expand...

Rutgers has the same defensive S&P rating as Duke, a team we were only able to put up 12 points against last year. Tate scored 12 by himself and didn't even start.

It's bad reporting when you're alluding to a particular player losing the job when u have only seen them in a controlled setting and depth charts have come out contradicting your reports.
 
Why do people get so tight when someone reports their opinion on what they see. I didnt see footballville putting anyone down just saying how he feel from what he seen. All opinions never will be the same regardless of what it is you speak on. To me I dont see him as being bias. Now if we all see the scrimmage and Tate ball and he says the same then you can make a point. But right now you cant say that.
 
Advertisement
D RevLee said:
You can keep ignoring that being a leader on and off the field is important or knowing the playbook is important but if they can't do that, they won't play.

Tate is accurate enough or he wouldn't have been rated a 5 star for most of his recruitment, wouldnt have received a scholarship from one of the best head coaches of all time, or wouldnt have went 10/10 against Rutgers and 23/28 as a whole. Sounds

Cam, Baker, Johnny. All 3 Heisman winners. All 3 were not the most accurate but their ability to extend plays made windows open up more.
Click to expand...

Did you even look at Tate throws?
I can actually pull up a post of him prior to coming here and I broke his tape of throws down and everything was short shorts which artificially inflates completion percentage numbers, (i.e., all high percentage throws and maybe 2 or 3 deep shots the whole time.)
I believe the same size is too small and the competition he played wasn't enough to have a competent analysis.
Furthermore, let's remember that at Bishop Gorman who was on his team (i.e., Brevin Jordan, Bubba Bolden, etc.) , and again when he was in at OSU the talent around him in comparison to versus.
Lots of variables to look at, can't just look at 23/28, that's lazy.
 
Cane passion said:
I've notice in coach Stubblefield drills he usually has the receivers in one line waiting for there rep. As a coach I like to maximize my time in individual periods by creating multiple lines there fore getting more reps. This can be done by utilizing the (GA'S ) graduate assistant's. I just find that players get chatty and loose out on reps when it's only one line. IMO obviously
Click to expand...
No he doesnt. That's just these morons yall count on for these videos arent bright enough to look around. He always uses multiple groupings unless absolutely necessary. Not very much depth right now so that is an issue in itself.
 
Back
Top