Pentagon Cane
Ghostriders in the sky.
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2012
- Messages
- 9,304
So you don't think that SunLife needs renovations after 27 years? And the downside for the University of Miami is what exactly? Ross uses his funds to make the renovations and that's bad for Dade County and the University of Miami. Good lord.
That stadium needed to go away. Any move that kept that regulating stadium intact for several more decades was a loss for the community. The fact that the Canes somehow ignored more than 20 years of evidence and attached themselves to that glorified neutral site is more than I can take. I started to respond to multiple posts in this thread but the topic in general is so infuriating I try to stay away.
Any simpleton can rationalize a patch. Sure a patch is technically an improvement. I can patch my 20 year old lawnmower with some new parts. No matter how many hundreds of millions we use to patch Sun Life it's still a bland design in an irrelevant location. It's an awful location for a pro franchise because there's no spice or animosity of a great city in that area. The opponent lands at the airport and then tries to restrain laughter while heading toward the middle of nowhere. Half of them think they are headed for the Calder barns to play the game. In our case it's not only pathetic it's more like a parody. Yeah, let's remove all pretense of a college atmosphere and play somewhere where we need to check our gas level before heading away from campus.
Keep in mind that the patchwork, regardless of cost, is hardly ideal. It's not an optimum roof or optimum seating arrangement. It's merely whatever will attach to an old flawed design that was never intended to include patches of that type. And make no mistake, there will be errors. Nothing can be fully anticipated.
I walked up the ramp last Saturday night in absolute hysterics that Stephen Ross insisted it will be the equivalent of a new stadium. That stadium is rotting and aging at the core. You can't mistake it for a new stadium unless you haven't visited anything built after 1995. It reminded me of Steve Jobs, early in his second tour, when he said that Apple OS 9 would be the equivalent of a new computer. Meanwhile, behind the scenes Apple was already dumping 9 in preparation for the truly exponential leap to OS X. Not that I'm comparing Ross to Jobs. The sad aspect is that Ross truly believes what he is saying. He has nothing behind the curtain. Instead of a visionary we have clods at every level.
I'm into my 50s and can't believe we managed to bungle so many decisions that it turned out this way. Shouldn't be possible. When I was a kid the Dolphins were the sharpest team in the league, grabbing Shula and Warfield for a comparative pittance. As weak as the Canes were, we had the Orange Bowl as a lingering trump card in case we ever became special. Somehow it all dissolved into Miami Gardens. And now I suppose we have rely on a contrived desperate patchwork somehow exchanging a neutral site into rousing home advantage, even though there's no historical example, at least none that I'm aware of.
Somebody in this thread claimed the '80s Canes made the Orange Bowl what it was. Talk about ignorance. The '70s Dolphins still hold the NFL record for longest home winning streak at 31. I attended those games as a kid. My dad got season tickets for the family beginning in 1972. Dad always had great instincts and timing. We occupied a venue that held the longest pro and college winning streaks yet brainstormed to rubble it. At least I did my part in writing letters to Dee and Shalala in 2007, detailing all the devastating specifics.
The best way to evaluate a home venue is relationship of home results to road results. By the time we departed for Sun Life it had established itself as a decisively below average home site for more than 20 years. I've detailed the numbers here and elsewhere. The Dolphins forfeited 2.5 points per game on average compared to their Orange Bowl years. That's a net comparison because it focuses on results in road games. The difference from home to road should be 5.5 points on average. In the Orange Bowl it was considerably higher while in Sun Life it's far lower. Looking at it that way you account for differences in eras so nobody can sloppily assert that the Dolphins were a better team overall in their Orange Bowl years than after they moved to Sun Life.
Here is a recent link from late 2013 that evaluates the same measure beginning in 2002, when the NFL's current franchise layout began once the Texans joined the league. You'll note Seattle and Baltimore at top -- the two most recent Super Bowl champs -- while Sun Life comfortably near the bottom: http://grantland.com/features/bill-barnwell-best-home-field-advantages/
Wrigley Field makes the Chicago Cubs a blast to watch...the field and the team are inextricably linked to themselves and the community....even though they are perennial losers. If they ever destroyed Wrigley Field the Cubs would simply be losers.....losers not worth going out of your way to see or bother with.
The Orange Bowl made Cane football fun to watch - including through all those supposedly miserable years in the 70's when we cursed and booed the endless conveyer belt of lousy HC's. It was always fun.
The Miami Hurricanes without the OB are now the Cubs without Wrigley.
Not having a home field is a huge, gigantic, massive hole in the ship.....I'm simply shocked how more don't get it and that every stone isn't being overturned to find a solution.
It has nothing to do with getting it, and I don't disagree with you. For those of us who grew up in the OB, and for me in the mid-60s, it is sorely missed. The so called stone you want turned over is dollars. I've neither hear nor read anybody offer a viable economic plan on how to raise the funds to build a dedicated University of Miami stadium.
Hey, I'm all for a viable long term option. I see nobody leading it within the community.
Last edited: