other site's article "Chances '18 recruits from Fl decommit"

[SpikeUM]

I am 99.9679539% sure that not a single one of those percentages are correct.

 

[Umbra]

LOL

just look at those percentages

Pete with the heat and shade in the same post.

 

[MedleyCane]

Based on past history and what goes on at virtually 99 percent of college football programs, it would not be a surprise to me
if not all of our commits stick, especially if some of our 2017 freshmen start playing often and well.
Opposing coaches will sell them about being buried in the depth chart and some of them will buy some of that BS.
It will be up to our coaches and players to play attractive football and win alot of games and also on our fans to
show up to games to give as best a gameday atmosphere as possible.

 

[DC1986]

May as well have said 78.25%. Go ahead and add some additional fake significant digits. Because the whole thing is fake AF

It would look more scientific if they added numbers after the decimal point.

"More scientific"? It's not scientific at all, those numbers don't even add up to 100.

I didn't click on the link, so I wouldn't know that.

I'm pretty sure that you clicked on it. You're denying it way too much. Reminds me of that scene where Austin Powers denies that the Swedish made pp enlarger is his...lol

https://youtu.be/mTSYPg-KxhQ

 

[1mg of Epi]

Worth the read... if only to see how many are commited to the U, and how many aren't commited to the trailer parks north of us.

 

[Cane Dynasty]

https://n.rivals.com/news/flipping-in-florida-chances-2018-recruits-from-florida-decommit


It's something I've been thinking about lately so I found this interesting.
Been thinking about it for a few reasons:
1) every class has guys that decommit
2) every class has guys they add late
3) it's only March, alot can happen.

Are we naive to think that everyone currently committed will stick with Miami?
Obviously I hope we keep everyone we currently have.

Very efficient troll account. I bet your porst-to-troll ratio is similar to my crank-to-sac ratio.

 

[Bunker Mentality]

May as well have said 78.25%. Go ahead and add some additional fake significant digits. Because the whole thing is fake AF

It would look more scientific if they added numbers after the decimal point.

"More scientific"? It's not scientific at all, those numbers don't even add up to 100.

https://youtu.be/pjvQFtlNQ-M