North Florida Cane
Freshman
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2016
- Messages
- 335
Everyone is always taking shots at ESPN. I must be missing something. The First Take/Bayless era was not a good look, but FS1, the only alternative is taking the debate/hot take format to another level.
IMO they're just an easy target for the new-age internet fan. They show games and report the news. When nothing else is on I throw it on. I don't see the big deal that people are so anti-ESPN. They have biases but those are mostly ratings related, market size, etc. The analysis isn't always great but shows like PTI & Russillo and Kanell provide fair insight.
As far as us, there is a slight disrespect but nothing egregious like SI. ****, The 30 for 30 documentaries kept us relevant when the play on the field was the definition of mediocre and has helped with recruiting.
Been noticing this for a while now, here included, just curious.
I may sign up for 999 fake accounts just to down vote this post 1,000 times.
And my sentiments echo everyone else here, except I hate that phony POS Jerk Curbstreet.
View attachment 44111
Ridiculous hearing him contend Ohio State and Penn State both should be in the playoffs last season.
He's the king of passive-aggressive BS -- and he gets defensive as **** when people call him out on it.
If Curbstreet was any kind of professional, he wouldn't have been jumping around on the sideline like a 10-year-kid while employed as an ESPN "analyst" ...
Edit: And nothing personal to the OP, my fellow Cane.
herbstreit is cool in my book. you can tell he understands that miami being elite is good for college football.
Don't let that phony MFer fool you, brah