OT: Chickillo

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement
That's merely childish stuff.

I'm not surprised that you keep score that way. That's what an insecure loser would do.

So insecure losers don’t create 1,000 different avatars just to post about how much smarter they are compared to everybody else?
 
Keep going Brian. I’m just pouring gasoline on the fire lol.
 
So insecure losers don’t create 1,000 different avatars just to post about how much smarter they are compared to everybody else?

A person wouldn't have to create multiple accounts if he didn't keep getting banned for petty reasons.

I can only say that I'm smarter than you if you keep proving it.
 
Plodding, slow-twitch, not a good athlete.

All of his positives are technical. Strong hands, good arm extension.

Yet the geniuses on this board blame his coaches for him being a mediocre player.

Clueless.

STRENGTHS Moves around the defensive line and plays with consistency. Generates leverage at the point of attack. Good strength for his size. Held his own in one-on-one scraps against right tackle T.J. Clemmings from Pitt. Has strong hands and gets arm extension into target at snap. Has plus read and feel against the run. Plays square to the line and is able to maintain balance and hold his ground against power.

WEAKNESSES Production as a pass rusher stalled during his time at Miami. Failed to live up to five-star billing coming in. Tweener. Lacks explosive qualities. Plodding and slow-twitch as a pass rusher, failing to consistently stress the edge of a blocker either from defensive-tackle or defensive-end spot. Needs more bulk and thickness to his lower body. Gets overwhelmed by double teams. More of a stalemate player than snap winner.

DRAFT PROJECTION Round 5 or 6

SOURCES TELL US "He doesn't have a position as far as I can tell. I don't think he projects inside or outside. He's just caught between positions and there isn't anything that he does really well." -- NFC director of scouting

BOTTOM LINE Technically sound player who lacks the desired burst and pass-rush skills to be a full-time defensive end and needs more bulk to play inside. Chickillo could use more length, but with his arm extension and strength at the point of attack, he could find his way as a backup strong-side defensive end in a 4-3.
 
To dumb @$$Es like you who can't tell the difference between a 4-3 DE & a bloated up 3-4 DE.

Criminal how Folden & D'ontknow$h!t screwed that kid's College career up.

Funny how NFL scouts and coaches rated him much the same as his college coaches did.

Slow, plodding, slow-twitch.

But it's all his coach's fault.

Sure, pal.
 
This is not true.

Did you read the thread at all?

Guy make his first tackle all season and people are calling out other posters, saying Golden screwed him, saying that he's "eat" in this current defense.

Laughable stuff after one of the worst edge defenders in the league made one tackle.
First post in this thread was that Chic made a nice tackle. Nothing else.

Your response? My god! It was only 1 tackle...he's only had 1 tackle this season...

As if anything else was proposed. Nobody said he was having a nice season...yet you felt the need to chime in with him being rated one of the worst edge defenders in the league...but he is in the league and has been for three seasons.

Al Golden and Mark D'onofrio did ***** a lot of guys by having them gain too much weight and play out of their natural positions. This is an undeniable fact based on the total lack of defense under those two clowns versus what we have fielded since their departure--largely with the guys they recruited. So there's a little evidence to back up the assertion that guys who didn't perform well under Golden and Co. would perform better in a different system.

It takes an absolute, self absorbed moran to even argue otherwise, yet you'll continue to do so until your next band for spamming the board. I walked away for 30 minutes to grab a sandwich and come back to 9 notifications from you whining and complaining about not being treated fairly. You're not doing anything wrong, after all. You just needed to remind the board 39 times that Chic has only made one tackle even thought the topic of the thread was that one tackle.
 
Advertisement
First post in this thread was that Chic made a nice tackle. Nothing else.

You are so dishonest.

Why just the initial post? Because every one after that was comical in it's praise of Chickillo, it's calling out of other people and it's blaming of Golden.
 
Dude is taking some serious L's in here.

Might be time to hit the showers kid.
 
As if anything else was proposed.

There was.

You're just lying.

Everybody can read this thread again and see that after the initial post it went straight to poster call outs, coach blaming and other hysteria.

In other words a typical CIS thread.
 
yet you felt the need to chime in with him being rated one of the worst edge defenders in the league...but he is in the league and has been for three seasons.

So I felt the need to post the truth?

What an indictment!
 
Last edited:
Al Golden and Mark D'onofrio did ***** a lot of guys by having them gain too much weight and play out of their natural positions.

Name them.

Nobody has really out-performed their college production in the NFL. The one example everyone has tried to give (Chickillo) isn't true.
 
This is an undeniable fact based on the total lack of defense under those two clowns versus what we have fielded since their departure--largely with the guys they recruited. So there's a little evidence to back up the assertion that guys who didn't perform well under Golden and Co. would perform better in a different system.

The defense has performed better because of Diaz's aggressiveness. That aggressiveness wouldn't make Chickillo faster, less plodding or a better pass-rusher.

If that was true then Chickillo would be appreciably better in an NFL scheme than he was at Miami.

He's not.
 
Advertisement
I comment once. You reply 6 times. Can't figure out why you keep getting band?

Edit: 8 replies now. 4 just to call me a dishonest liar.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top