5ringshowboutu
"Wynwood **** sucking short bus faqqit"
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2014
- Messages
- 1,422
Ad hominem attacks is a debate tactic for losers. You are flailing at this point. But at least you are attempting a discussion instead of going on your typical school girl emoji rant.
Eh you want him to defend saying "Isreal might have had a part to play" while defending killing hundreds of innocents because of the tactics of the hundreds of thousands of Israeli enemies.Let me help you along since you are actually trying to get involved in a rare discussion instead of emoji slinging. Going back to my original post you said that it was possible Israel could have been involved "you wouldn't put it past them" and I proposed a rationale why which you really haven't refuted.
You simply attacked it without any substantial rebuttal. And, you are talking out both sides of your mouth. Take a position and defend it.
You see, that's how debate works. Actually having to defend a position instead of deflecting to avoid having to actually exhibit a coherent thought process that can be reasonably defended.
So let's here a defense why you think it wasn't them. Who may have been responsible, assuming it was an "attack" of some sort?
You cry in your word salads about ad hominem attacks but started with the "stick to emojies you're ignorant".
Many posts of just straight cry.