Read the article.
The “mole” was a known member of the administration. They knew who they were dealing with. So “mole” is not actually correct, since a “mole” is a secret, unknown spy.
What happened previously at Baylor, assuming it’s all true, is an abomination. But this is just a lot of howling to make the alleged “spying” seem more sinister than it really is. It certainly needs to be looked into, but a member of the administration communicating their activities is to be expected.
There’s always a tendency to sensationalize something and make it seem as though there is some are some nefarious activities occurring, I’m not so sure about this.
Compared to what happened at Ohio State, and a predetermined investigation, designed to achieve a predetermined result, this is nothing. The Ohio State outrage of an investigation was so blatant, so clearly designed to achieved a minimum punishment for Urban Meyer, that it’s pretty much universally recognized as being a sham. That’s what people need to be focusing on. IMO.