caneforlifeforreal
To The White Meat
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2012
- Messages
- 2,192
Tempo, tempo, tempo. If we run tempo and get on the ball quickly, that gives Beck time to adjust . . .
I agree. If we get in the same amount of third and longs like we did with A&M we lose as that’s where the disguising coverages will be most effective.Before I get into this, let me preface by saying I think our DL has an advantage and can cause chaos, especially if we keep OSU behind the chains. As for our OL vs. their DL, that’s a draw. Now, their secondary and scheme versus our QB/offense is where things get concerning. Matt Patricia is from the Belichick tree, so he’s going to take away your strength and force you to win with your weakness—like making a righty go left in basketball.
You won’t see nearly as much confusion or creativity with blitzing as A&M, but the confusion will be in the secondary. They’ll show Cover 8, Cover 6, Cover 4, and Cover 2, disguising one as another, and also use combo coverages. This is exactly what Beck struggles with: coming off the first read or not trusting what his eyes see. When the picture starts changing, Beck tends to get confused or throw picks.
Getting back to winning with your weakness—and being a Belichick protégé—I’d expect him to use a number-two corner on MT with some help over the top, maybe a bracket, then put the top cover guy on somebody like Daniels with no help. It makes things confusing for a DC trying to scheme around stopping a slot guy, since that player can be moved around, you never know where he’ll align, and he’s often off the LOS. That makes it harder to jam or disrupt the release.
The game will come down to Beck and the passing game, plain and simple. We won’t be able to line up and maul them like an undersized A&M defense. We just need to run enough to keep them off balance—at least get the attempts. Unlike @Hurricane23, I don’t like this matchup as much as the previous game, but I still see his point. There are enough areas where we have advantages, and IMO this game is very winnable. Just don’t beat ourselves—which is easier said than done.
Maybe….The best defense we face all year is the defense we face on Greentree…This is by far the best defense we've played all year. They have the best players and it isn't close.
There are a lot of suggestions in this thread that won't work for a full game.
1) Tempo. Not against a defense of this caliber. Recipe for 3 and out or turnover. Will also gas our defense.
2) Short/quick passing game. I called for it many times this year. But it's not so simple in this game. It could work very early and then very late as ee adjust. We have to pick our spots in this one. If you repeat too much this will end up in a couple of picks against disguised zones with players of their caliber.
3) "Testing" the defense with deeper throws. No shot. Beck won't have that kind of time and isn't strong in this anyway. Won't happen. We'd lose by 50.
The passing game needs to work in spots, but to win, we will have to run the ball. Dawson's gonna need to figure out every running trick up his sleeve. And the OL must play the game of their collective football lives.
Be prepared for 20 third downs and many 4th downs.
It would have tied v IndianaOur offense has always been our weaker spot. Beck is our Achilles heel
Our skill position room, outside of Toney, is not elite. I hope Beck balls out and plays the game of his life, because I don’t think 10 points is winning this one.
It’s criminal that they don’t let Beck call audiblesYour $4m six year senior QB has to win you a game