- Joined
- Jul 18, 2025
- Messages
- 6
Just saying I expect a little more from the online gurus. Would hate for this to be the reason we get off the rails. Hard to believe they were blindsided by having this bad of guard play.
The sinking ship is your stay on this site.My big question for this team is, how does a Cristobal/Mirabal team in the NIL era miss so bad on the O Line.
The rest of the offense is so good it covers it up to some degree but I can’t help but think this is gonna sink this ship at some point.
OL, OTOH, was a miss in the portal imo. Outside of Sisi and Samson, the past 3-4 HS recruiting classes have been a question mark. Lot of duds and it's becoming a depth concern this year. Many of us were clamoring for another portal depth piece or 2 but we went elsewhere.
Recruiting I'm sure is a fun time.Were folks saying this at the beginning of the year? Secondary from a personnel perspective has been fine. Injuries have killed us.
OL, OTOH, was a miss in the portal imo. Outside of Sisi and Samson, the past 3-4 HS recruiting classes have been a question mark. Lot of duds and it's becoming a depth concern this year. Many of us were clamoring for another portal depth piece or 2 but we went elsewhere.
Winning has brought out many brilliant “lurkers” and porsters that have been dormant for years.Dear OP
Thank you for taking the time to start yet another thread chastising the OL. Your keen insight and eye for detail, combined with your pessimism is exactly what’s been missing from this forum and the OL in general. Excellent way to pop your cherry on CiS.
Sincerely.
No one.
We are averaging 49 points a game. F it. The O line blows.Winning has brought out many brilliant “lurkers” and posters that have been dormant for years.Dear OP
Thank you for taking the time to start yet another thread chastising the OL. Your keen insight and eye for detail, combined with your pessimism is exactly what’s been missing from this forum and the OL in general. Excellent way to pop your cherry on CiS.
Sincerely.
No one.
Recruiting I'm sure is a fun time.
It's not easy getting stud after stud for the OL every year after pulling Cooper, Okunlola, McCoy, Cici, and pretty much starting.
So there wasn't that much room for a stud OL to come in here and get early ish playing time, while also not having the best on-field product prior to Cam Ward, which is where all the above players came from and the current starters are from (outside of our Guards). The past two classes have seen the fruits of the success. I expect this to be the worst OL moving forward, and it isn't too bad.
Sorry, my goal isn’t beating BC and Pitt. Anyone who says the line is fine is delusional. My bad for thinking these OL coaches/recruiters should have it in better shape than it is.We are averaging 49 points a game. F it. The O line blows.Winning has brought out many brilliant “lurkers” and posters that have been dormant for years.Dear OP
Thank you for taking the time to start yet another thread chastising the OL. Your keen insight and eye for detail, combined with your pessimism is exactly what’s been missing from this forum and the OL in general. Excellent way to pop your cherry on CiS.
Sincerely.
No one.![]()
Sorry, my goal isn’t beating BC and Pitt. Anyone who says the line is fine is delusional. My bad for thinking these OL coaches/recruiters should have it in better shape than it is.
I agree people are dramatic but I think we have e graduated from comparing ourselves to the ACC. The question should be, whose OL in the country would we take?People being dramatic af. We haven’t even missed on the OL. Who’s OL in the ACC would you take over Miami?
Could have hit Lofton down the seam in one of those sacks. But you have to take the good with the bad he is balling!He takes a lot of sacks he doesn’t have to by not taking the easy quick opening routesNo, the o line is being covered up. Just watch how much pressure Mensah is under and how often we get hit as soon as the rb hits the line. It’s mostly yards after carry that is working. I’d argue the only guy not out of position is Rodriguez. And still having the number 1 offense only means how good we could be if we had a better line.
This is right. Another aspect of roster and budget management is how much money we spend, for better or worse, retaining players. I think Mario believes that loyalty to players and roster continuity help build the right culture.One element lost in this discussion is roster management, and more specifically allocation of funds.
The coaches banked on their ability to develop personnel who were already in the building (part of that personnel is a heavy investment in a 5* frosh - he didn't meet the lofty expectations placed upon him as an 18 year old but he isn't a bust either), and they also banked that many issues (if they emerged) could be solved with a significant investment in the most critical position on the field...Welcome Mr. Mensah.
Prior to Max's injury, the OL was turning the corner and gelling. It's unfortunate that happened, and the staff had to pivot, but that's their job.
OL has been frustrating sure if you're comparing it to the best OL in America of the last two seasons (Mirabel and Cristobal had everything to do with that), but its been more than serviceable. The OL is also good enough to get us to where we want to be.
Which portal guy?I agree people are dramatic but I think we have e graduated from comparing ourselves to the ACC. The question should be, whose OL in the country would we take?People being dramatic af. We haven’t even missed on the OL. Who’s OL in the ACC would you take over Miami?
For me, I think the big whiff was Cantwell. We paid an exorbitant price tag and I think everyone thought he was a day 1 starter like Francis. Instead, he doesn’t sniff the field. That money could have been spent on a portal guy. Cantwell hopefully works out long term but near term his salary is dead cap space
Who are these one or two proven, older offensive linemen we should’ve brought in? Cline and Meriweather meet those qualifiers. We passed on Seaton. Who else was available that I’m missing?This is right. Another aspect of roster and budget management is how much money we spend, for better or worse, retaining players. I think Mario believes that loyalty to players and roster continuity help build the right culture.One element lost in this discussion is roster management, and more specifically allocation of funds.
The coaches banked on their ability to develop personnel who were already in the building (part of that personnel is a heavy investment in a 5* frosh - he didn't meet the lofty expectations placed upon him as an 18 year old but he isn't a bust either), and they also banked that many issues (if they emerged) could be solved with a significant investment in the most critical position on the field...Welcome Mr. Mensah.
Prior to Max's injury, the OL was turning the corner and gelling. It's unfortunate that happened, and the staff had to pivot, but that's their job.
OL has been frustrating sure if you're comparing it to the best OL in America of the last two seasons (Mirabel and Cristobal had everything to do with that), but its been more than serviceable. The OL is also good enough to get us to where we want to be.
And I get that. But this offseason, I wouldn’t have been upset if we let a corner and a running back go (say O’Connor and Pringle) and used that money to pursue an experienced OL in the portal.
Of course, fast-forward to now, and thank God we kept O’Connor. Pringle, I’m not so sure about. These are extremely difficult decisions, and it’s easy to judge with the benefit of hindsight.
I also think we may have over-invested in our ’27 high school OL class when we should have prioritized bringing in one or two proven, older offensive linemen from the portal.