MEGA New Miami Adidas Ultraboost🔥 - The Shoe and Nike/Adidas Thread.

First of all, most of the fanbase likes the 2000s look. Second, yes Nike obviously designed them and we were fine it with.

Third, Miami definitely failed to tell them F off. Given that, why do you keep blaming Nike and not Miami? Adidas literally did the same thing until we didn’t fail to finally tell them to F off.

Why did Adidas ever think the feathers were a good idea? What about the uniforms made of literal trash? Why did they ever think the baby **** green military uniforms were a good idea? Why did they ever think the strawberry jerseys were a good idea?

Both companies have come up with garbage designs. The difference is Nike is years ahead of them in their MATERIALS and CONSTRUCTION and FIT.

So, if we all agree that Miami has the power to dictate what designs it wants, then why would you continue to go with the company who literally uses Nike templates from the 2000s? This company couldn’t even get the U on the collar correct until a few years ago. The name plates are from high school.

I hope we stay with the classic forever. Like you, I think it’s the best and represents our brand the best. However, I think Nike is the better company and is more than capable of making us a classic jersey with the best materials and construction.

We're not that far apart. We both prefer our classic look. Happily so does the entire program these days including our apparently long term coach/former player, so I'm cool.

I just think Nike is more culpable for the 2000-2014 uniform crimes than you. Sure UM was culpable. But Nike wasn't an innocent bystander.

In the final analysis I don't care if Nike, Adidas or Sketchers makes our uniforms. UM should look like UM on the field.
 
Advertisement
A sincerely asked question (promise) asking the question of whether posters who liked the Nike 2000-2013 uniforms would like to go back to those uniforms is a...lie? LOL

You're the best.
I mean seriously those jerseys are way better than the 2015-16 era jerseys with feathers I’m sorry those were flat out the most embarrassing uniforms we wore

**** we barley got them to stop having the U on the collar not be warped or have the captain “C” patch **** near be on the shoulder pad area seemingly by the rear delts

Adidas has treated us as 2nd maybe even 3rd tier school… the only fault of ours with Nike is we started to slip off and the program was not being run by people who gave a **** and let it go
 
I mean seriously those jerseys are way better than the 2015-16 era jerseys with feathers I’m sorry those were flat out the most embarrassing uniforms we wore

**** we barley got them to stop having the U on the collar not be warped or have the captain “C” patch **** near be on the shoulder pad area seemingly by the rear delts

Adidas has treated us as 2nd maybe even 3rd tier school… the only fault of ours with Nike is we started to slip off and the program was not being run by people who gave a **** and let it go

Which school has adidas treated as 1st tier?
 
A number of posters seem to actually like the Nike uniforms circa 2000-2013. I don't get that, but to each their own.

The people who run the program don't seem to agree since we've gone back to our dynasty era classic look and won't be doing the Nike looks anytime soon it appears.

For folks who prefer the Nike aesthetics, why do you think the program doesn't want us to wear those looks anymore?

Would you prefer dropping the classic look for the Nike 2000-2013 look?

Ummm, what?

Richt didn’t like the flamingo uniforms & said he believed we should have a more classic look. Did u not see Adidas now tampering to see if they can mimic the Y2K uniforms? Lol.

Have u not seen Adidas giving us a plethora of alternates including a full camouflage jawn this season, a 7-11 uniform last season, a tangerine & aqua uniform in 2018, an off white & pine green maze futbol uniform in 2019. Like what r u talking about? Ur take on the early 2000’s unis is ur opinion, but u’re by far in the minority & just b/c Richt had a problem w Adidas’ early iterations ≠ we had a problem w Nike’s early 2000 or even their 2014 designs. We had a problem w Adidas’ designs, their font, & their fit which, to their credit, did an admirable job of fixing over the past decades
 
Advertisement


Uhhhh ohhh we got action guys

IMG_3423.jpeg


Spiderman Blaming GIF
 
I get the bball part but I don’t get TAMU. How does their drip outshine ours?

This is what TAMU received for their 1st Rd Match Up against us

IMG_3424.jpeg


IMG_3425.jpeg


IMG_3426.jpeg


This is what we received:
IMG_3427.jpeg


IMG_3430.jpeg

Now besides the zip up sweat suit we just received, this is what we have on file, thus far, for the Cotton Bowl:

IMG_3428.jpeg


IMG_3432.jpeg


We have way more non-branded CFP items from other sources than Adidas.
 
Adidas apparel is such a hare wear to pull off. The logo takes up too much space and looks generic. Placement often overshadows team logo. Their designs look labor intensive.....for something that should be really simple.
 
This is what TAMU received for their 1st Rd Match Up against us

View attachment 348587

View attachment 348589

View attachment 348590

This is what we received:
View attachment 348591

View attachment 348592
Now besides the zip up sweat suit we just received, this is what we have on file, thus far, for the Cotton Bowl:

View attachment 348593

View attachment 348594

We have way more non-branded CFP items from other sources than Adidas.

Looks to me the same **** that ATM got.
 
Advertisement
Which do we think has a better story behind the name?

For the swoosh, we have the Greek personification of victory.

For the three stripes, we have a shortened version of the founder Adi Dasler's name.

Before we start what is likely to be a spirited but cordial debate, I deduct points from the swoosh for having foisted on us an ugly Anglicized pronunciation of "Nike".
 
Back
Top