forums

New ‘22 offer - Jack Pyburn - commits to UiF

IMG_3563.jpeg
 
If they are indeed lying on the kid, that should be a huge stain on their program. Because buddy looks crazy with those demands. LOL.
 
Jassid82 said:
If they are indeed lying on the kid, that should be a huge stain on their program. Because buddy looks crazy with those demands. LOL.
Click to expand...
I thought the same thing too when I read that. However, what if there’s some freshman that’s making more than him who haven’t played one snap. Or may be on campus and not putting in the work that he is. We may think that sounds crazy, but we really have no idea what some of these other kids are making. And it’s not like the kid was on the bench or playing and not producing at all. I’m not saying he deserves that kind of money, but we really don’t know what the market is for these players right now.

However, I don’t see that being true at all.
But agents get involved and things get really ugly.
 
Last edited:
JayCane20 said:
Another instance of UF writers lying to deflect from losing a starter.

Was he that good? No. Would he start for them next year? No. But they can’t help themselves from spinning everything
Click to expand...


I think he would have started. He is great against the run. Would they have pulled him for nickel and dime packages, **** yes.

Kid has been a model player, never gave them any trouble, flipped from UM to UF even after UF slow-played him until the last minute of the recruiting cycle.

And now The Gator is trying to money-shame a kid who they've probably paid zero-point-zero for his first three years.

Sad.
 
Jassid82 said:
If they are indeed lying on the kid, that should be a huge stain on their program. Because buddy looks crazy with those demands. LOL.
Click to expand...


No he doesn't look crazy. He would have been their leading returning tackler, and he wants to be developed and not be pulled from every passing situation.

It's pretty funny how bullet points 3 and 4 are saying essentially the same thing. And bullet point 2 is just "don't recruit a Portal kid over me and put me on the bench for my senior year".

Kid stayed local and loyal to Hogtown and Slingblade Billy. He should be compensated.
 
TheOriginalCane said:
No he doesn't look crazy. He would have been their leading returning tackler, and he wants to be developed and not be pulled from every passing situation.

It's pretty funny how bullet points 3 and 4 are saying essentially the same thing. And bullet point 2 is just "don't recruit a Portal kid over me and put me on the bench for my senior year".

Kid stayed local and loyal to Hogtown and Slingblade Billy. He should be compensated.
Click to expand...
45k a month???? lol. Was he All-Sec and I missed it?
 
TheOriginalCane said:
I think he would have started. He is great against the run. Would they have pulled him for nickel and dime packages, **** yes.

Kid has been a model player, never gave them any trouble, flipped from UM to UF even after UF slow-played him until the last minute of the recruiting cycle.

And now The Gator is trying to money-shame a kid who they've probably paid zero-point-zero for his first three years.

Sad.
Click to expand...
After they went crazy with ridiculous offers to recruits, this was too obvious..the guys ON the team who have already produced deserve an equal part of the much larger pie.

Everybody saw this coming.

They'll lose other starters too.
 
JayCane20 said:
Another instance of UF writers lying to deflect from losing a starter.

Was he that good? No. Would he start for them next year? No. But they can’t help themselves from spinning everything
Click to expand...

Just like blowhardstein and saying the fsu qb was asking for 7 figures.
 
JG14 said:
Just like blowhardstein and saying the fsu qb was asking for 7 figures.
Click to expand...
And it's funny because he's a very mobile QB with tools for a good arm and they just ran him off that quickly. I thought he fit great in that system

I'm sure they still had to pay Castellanos market rate.
 
JayCane20 said:
And it's funny because he's a very mobile QB with tools for a good arm and they just ran him off that quickly. I thought he fit great in that system

I'm sure they still had to pay Castellanos market rate.
Click to expand...

They wasted a year of his eligibility and didn't develop him at all. They owed him a decent amount for that alone. I think he is a kid who after a year or two developing under the right guy could be very good
 
JG14 said:
They wasted a year of his eligibility and didn't develop him at all. They owed him a decent amount for that alone. I think he is a kid who after a year or two developing under the right guy could be very good
Click to expand...
I'd take him here TBH the arm tools are there and he's mobile. He had no chance in that system with that OL and WR group as a true freshman

Not giving 7 figures right away unless he won the job

He may end up at UNC under Belichick or Ole Miss under Kiffin and he'd do great.
 
Back
Top