Myles Garrett

For those who are calling for charges against Garrett, a hockey player sucker punched another hockey player and ended his career...no charges, so if you guys want Garrett charged call for everyone to be charged or go home and enjoy your beer
Bertuzzi? IIRC charges were being weighed, no?
 
Advertisement
Already debunked lil buddy. Legal hit that occured simultaneously as the ball was pitched. Try again
That’s for you as well @verobeachcane
Um, the play was going to be flagged for roughing the QB for throwing his weight on him. Don't agree, cause it's football, but that's the rules.


With that being said, Mason acted like he was tougher than he was and paid for it.

But none of them was in the right.
 
There was no risk. MAGA caliber SAMs believe virtually everything along those lines. What do we hear...lies and fear, lies and fear, lies and fear.

Young people see straight through the lies and dismiss the fear. That's why that generation is a bit of a problem for the MAGA liars and their Roy Cohn heritage.

I have a classic MAGA SAM who sits next to me at the Canes games. Last weekend he insisted that billions of dollars are being diverted from social security funds to pay for the impeachment process. I howled in laughter but he insisted it is true.

Well of course is is true. You're getting it shoveled your way by the same types who have already identified how gullible you are.
Not sure what you are trying to say with the "how gullible you are". If you are implying I'm a Trump supporter, you're WAY off base. As far as I'm concerned he's one of the worst things to happen to this nation. But this isn't a board for politics. My point was that the post that HarrietTubmanCane referenced wasn't someone making a racist statement as he pretended, but someone reacting to what he erroneously thought was Garrett making a racist statement (but the quote supposedly from Garrett wasn't true.)
 
Really man? Wow yet you the main one talking accountability. How about don't pick fights with people and you have nothing to worry about in terms of someone trying to retaliate on you whether with a weapon or not. You sound like the type that God forbid if a person breaks into your home just looking to steal something with no weapon you would probably still shoot them and use stand your ground even though this person was unarmed and possibly tried to runaway after seeing you. Yet you speak of accountability? Right? SMH
Uh... WTF?
"I just forcefully entered your families home, all I wanted to do was steal your ****, why you gotta be all mad?!"
 
Really man? Wow yet you the main one talking accountability. How about don't pick fights with people and you have nothing to worry about in terms of someone trying to retaliate on you whether with a weapon or not. You sound like the type that God forbid if a person breaks into your home just looking to steal something with no weapon you would probably still shoot them and use stand your ground even though this person was unarmed and possibly tried to runaway after seeing you. Yet you speak of accountability? Right? SMH

The irony in this post is off the charts. Brings up accountability but then defends a criminal who breaks into your house.
 
For those who are calling for charges against Garrett, a hockey player sucker punched another hockey player and ended his career...no charges, so if you guys want Garrett charged call for everyone to be charged or go home and enjoy your beer

Yes, because a completely different situation happened 15 years ago where the player was not charged (people were calling for charges then and he did end up getting sued by the family) creates the precedent moving forward forever that no athlete can be charged for any act on the field. Swinging a helmet, using brass knuckles, going Last Boy Scout and shooting a guy on the field...all good bc that one guy wasn't charged that one time.
 
Advertisement
Not sure what you are trying to say with the "how gullible you are". If you are implying I'm a Trump supporter, you're WAY off base. As far as I'm concerned he's one of the worst things to happen to this nation. But this isn't a board for politics. My point was that the post that HarrietTubmanCane referenced wasn't someone making a racist statement as he pretended, but someone reacting to what he erroneously thought was Garrett making a racist statement (but the quote supposedly from Garrett wasn't true.)
Certified snowflake ❄️ ❄️❄️❄️❄️🎻 by his own admission 😂

Still haven’t proved that post was in response to the tweet. Still haven’t explained the other post I mentioned or the OJ comparison posts that infused race.
 
8B8F11C8-3547-4E1E-B962-B7B390B192D2.webp
2335F0F5-E697-4C82-B1E3-855F9ED28400.webp
11462616-7CBE-4C13-9BD2-A4BF12E4A38D.webp
 
Certified snowflake ❄ ❄❄❄❄🎻 by his own admission 😂

Still haven’t proved that post was in response to the tweet. Still haven’t explained the other post I mentioned or the OJ comparison posts that infused race.
...and here you are...still babbling.
 
Really man? Wow yet you the main one talking accountability. How about don't pick fights with people and you have nothing to worry about in terms of someone trying to retaliate on you whether with a weapon or not. You sound like the type that God forbid if a person breaks into your home just looking to steal something with no weapon you would probably still shoot them and use stand your ground even though this person was unarmed and possibly tried to runaway after seeing you. Yet you speak of accountability? Right? SMH

You can bet your *** on that! My house is locked up for YOUR protection, not mine. You come in uninvited, and you will not be walking out.
 
Advertisement
I opened this thread on this page and saw race and shooting unarmed robbers in you home. I’ll skip race as I knew that was coming and the dude can’t use a helmet like that. There’s no self defense. I’m not sure what the race issue is. I don’t want to know either.

As for the killing an unarmed robber in your home, for one, I don’t know how you have time to determine whether a robber is armed or not, especially when adrenaline is flowing. Secondly, I never practiced criminal law, but I remember this from law school, and if a person breaks into a domicile (home) that is occupied, there’s essentially a presumption of threat to life and a right to ensure your safety and that of your occupants in your domicile. If the criminal doesn’t rape or kill someone and runs out of the house, I do not think you can shoot them in the back in the street as the threat to life and limb is lifted. That will actually get you prosecuted.

That said - Don’t be a criminal breaking into people’s houses and you don’t have to worry about it. Lol at anyone feeling bad for the scumbag that gets killed robbing homes occupied by people and then crying victim. I’m pretty liberal and I’d shoot the fûcker as dead as a troll that Inday gobbled up on CIS.
 
Back
Top