SWFLHurricane
Recruit
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2014
- Messages
- 30,053
The Rocket was similar in size too Randall..I hope a 175lb receiver can outrun a 215lb RB.
The Rocket was similar in size too Randall..I hope a 175lb receiver can outrun a 215lb RB.
Can’t forget Edge.
I forgot how **** fast he was.
I always remembered how he hit the hole hard, broke a million tackles, and NEVER got pushed backwards.
But he could FLY. Rewatched his highlights and he would outrun guys who had the angle on him. You underestimate just how explosive he was because his stride was so smooth and easy.
So the phins couldnt have used an RB with 4.3 ypc with a chance to change the game with one carry. It’s not like 4.3 is chopped liver anyway
Watch the video and then get back to me. It's 17 straight minutes of long explosive runs. The guy is making moves to get himself to the open field that guys like mcgahee, Miller, or Homer simply couldn't do.
He's my favorite RB in school history.
McGahee, Gore, Portis, James Jackson & Duke are all close as well love them, but Edge was just my personal favorite.
Guys like Albert Bentley, Highsmith, Melvin Bratton, Cleveland Gary etc, we're all great too, but I was pretty much a baby for most of their time at Miami so I didn't really get to see them during their heyday.
Your comments assume your definition of explosiveness is some kind of accepted notion. You then use your belief to say "explosiveness" is the reason he's had success he's had. I'd say it's speed and acceleration.
I question anyone's "explosiveness" when they're mainly just fast and can accelerate. So your "nobody would question" is simply false. You define explosiveness narrowly. To be clear, it's your definition. You made it up. Like I have mine - which is broader. I think it makes more sense to call your examples "fast" and my more comprehensive characteristics placed under the broader "explosiveness" category, but like I've said twice now, it's up to how we define it.
I don't see how someone who could barely get started unless there was a clear path was as "explosive" as some other guys who could do more. Are guys like Miller and Spiller capable of explosive plays? Sure. They're really fast. Being fast leads to some explosive plays. Are they capable of getting tripped up by a finger? We've seen that countless times. Can they explode through a tackler in short yardage? Nah. Can they pop through a crowded space and breakout? Not as often. Lamar's explosive because two of the characteristics I consider necessary for "explosiveness" are elite, but he still falls outside of my Top 5.
The Vest isn't liking what he's seeing.
Also, what's with the blonde Frankenstein in the back??...
View attachment 114973
Jevarris James?Theres really only one choice here.....
Edge is the best RB in UM history imo His speed was effortless and consistent, so it looked like he wasn't really blazing, but he was turning defenders all day.
Randall Hill ran a 4.3 or Faster at the combine...Spanking the Rocket...
Right. And, I appreciate the different views.I agree with Dmoney’s definition.
It’s the speed and acceleration a guy has on the field in full pads. We use the term explosiveness to describe a big yardage play, but that is not the only criteria I use when considering explosiveness as a trait.
I consider power what a guy does when contact is made.
Shiftiness is the ability to change direction in a crowd.
Agility is the ability to move laterally.
Power, shiftiness, agility, and vision lead to explosive plays, but personally, that isn’t how I define the trait.
Looking at posts in this thread, it seems many see it differently, and that’s cool. Words always take on a definition specific to our perspective.
If Portis stayed in Denver my lord he would crap ton of yards