- Joined
- Sep 20, 2019
- Messages
- 1,794
Here's where the enormous stupidity of the average football fan who doesn't understand coaching rears its ugly head. ASU ranks #32 in overall talent. WSU ranks #70.
Of the 3 losses:
UCLA- 22
Utah- 47
ASU- 32
By comparison
Diaz's losses (Miami ranks #18)
UF- 15
VT- 29
UNC- 28
So all that has been established is that Leach's team has trouble holding leads against vastly superior teams. By the way, U Houston (55) also has more talent than WSU (70), so Leach gets another notch on his belt for wins over teams with better talent (he leads college football in that department). The chukleheads are predictable. If Sonny Dykes had done the same thing- had big leads against UCLA and ASU then lost the leads late in the 4th, these same ****gobblers would be saying, "Now that's a REAL coach, look at SMU competing with the big boys in the PAC 12. Miami should have hired Dykes."
It may come as a surprise to these ballgarglers, but SMU (64) has more talent than WSU (70).
2019 College Football Team Talent Composite
In order to create the most comprehensive Team Recruiting Ranking without any notion of bias, 247Sports Team Recruiting Ranking is solely based on the 247Sports Composite Rating.247sports.com
Then get more talent. I don't understand the issue. If he's just going to lose to teams that have more talent, what makes him so great?